1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional conditon

[MONTANAJACK]

Low hour (264)Cherry Condition
Blue/White Nautique

Matching Bimini
Matching Tandem axle trailer with new tires and new centrifigal tongue brake
Upgraded stereo with CD changer
New Sunbrella boat cover
PCM 351- runs flawlessly
Stored in insulated garage- never in water
***Includes BRAND NEW complete interior vinyl replacement from Christines (uninstalled)***

close up photos to follow soon.
boat in Missoula Montana

$15,500

Jack 406-240-3089
jackwade@lambros.com

[TRBenj]

RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional conditon

Thats no '94... looks like a '93. Check the hull number to confirm.

[darrel409]

RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional conditon

at that distance...?? how can you tell?? i cant see if the window is rounded or squared..??

[M3Fan]

RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional conditon

The angle on the transom is a giveaway. The gel is also like no 94 I've ever seen, unless it was repainted.

[Hollywood]

RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional conditon

Basically a 94 would have had a new gel pattern.

[AirTool]

RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional conditon

does 93 have wood stringers?

[AuMDLST]

1994 SNOB

1994 SNOB - Gel pattern is correct on the one offered - Curved windshield was first offered on 1994 - Transom is the same here on this 94 as well.

[AuMDLST]

RE: 1994 SNOB

Correction - not sure about the gel coat

[TRBenj]

Re: RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional conditon

The angle on the transom is a giveaway. The gel is also like no 94 I've ever seen, unless it was repainted.

Im not following you on the transom comment- a '93 and a '94 would look the same from that angle.

The gel style is the giveaway, though Im pretty sure that it says "Nautiques" in white towards the rear, which was only offered in combination with that gel style in '93. 90-93 said "Correct Craft", which wasnt as thick/blocky, and I dont think would be as obvious at the distance the picture was taken from. The distance makes the windshield hard to make out, but since they never offered the curved glass with that gel pattern, Im saying pre-94 for sure, most likely '93.

Hopefully the new interior is correct for the boat- a bunch of cushions arent compatible between the '93 and '94 model years!

[swooddc]

RE: Re: RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional condit

Airtool, no on the wood stringers, i think 90 or 91 was when they went composite.

[NautiqueJeff]

RE: Re: RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional condit

Nope. It was 1993.

By the way, here's my old 1994. I agree that the boat above probably is not a 1994.

[M3Fan]

Re: RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional conditon

The angle on the transom is a giveaway. The gel is also like no 94 I've ever seen, unless it was repainted.

Im not following you on the transom comment- a '93 and a '94 would look the same from that angle.

My perception is that the deck is a bit taller on the 90-93 deck making that 45 degree angled part longer. ICBW but it's something I noticed. This wouldn't be the first time we've disagreed about minute hull/deck angles. Look at that pic of Jeff's boat. You think that transom rubrail looks identical to the 90-93? No way. Shorter run of rubrail at 45 degrees, at least to my eyes.

[TRBenj]

Re: RE: 1994 Ski Nautique- 264 hours. Exceptional conditon

My perception is that the deck is a bit taller on the 90-93 deck making that 45 degree angled part longer. ICBW but it's something I noticed. This wouldn't be the first time we've disagreed about minute hull/deck angles. Look at that pic of Jeff's boat. You think that transom rubrail looks identical to the 90-93? No way. Shorter run of rubrail at 45 degrees, at least to my eyes.

Nope, the hull is exactly the same (only changes for '94 were in the deck), so the mating edge- ie, the rubrail- is exactly the same. Ive had my 90 next to my buddy's '94 on several occasions, and theres no difference. Youre not the only one with an eye for detail! Yellow_Flash_Colorz:

[MONTANAJACK]

owner comment

Greetings other posters! I am a little confused myself. I was told it was a 94 by the previous owner. It does NOT have a plywood floor. I thought I read 94 was the first year they went to glass floor. I sent Christines the VIN and they are the first indication that the boat was 1993. They made the vinyl to fit the VIN #. Posting a few other personal photos as I cant find good detailed close up interior and exterior ones right now. Thanks
Jack

[swooddc]

RE: owner comment

i defer to jeff on the wood stringers, i thought they changed it with hull design in 90. my bad. rub rail same till my 97.