For those of you who have been around CC boats for quite some time, wanted to get your opinion...
I have learned over the past few days that 2009 will bring not only a new boat to the lineup (216v), but will also take the 211 to a new entry-level buyer. It has been confirmed by a couple of dealers that the '09 211 will be moved to the more 'afordable' end of the market through limiting the options you can place on the 211 (keyed ignition, single hull color, few upgrades), reducing the margin to dealers and thus keeping the total price below $50K. The idea being that if a buyer wants a fully-optioned 211 (think TE), they will gravitate toward the 216v.
I think this is a colossal mistake by CC - so much so that I am backing off a purchase of a 2008 211 this week until the product line strategy is better understood. It seems CC is not paying attention to the dozens of industries that have learned this lesson the hard way - manage your product extensions appropriately and NEVER, under any circumstances, cheapen the value of an existing model. At the very least it creates confusion. At most, it could negatively impact values of pre-'09 211s - the same boat that has out-sold all other models combined... I suspect there are those that will argue that this will provide increasing price pressure on existing models - the truth is, nobody knows - and a pretty big gamble CC to make against a loyal base of customers.
My question: is this a common practice by CC? Are there other examples of prior years where the company decided to keep the same model while forcing down its initial value in the marketplace?
I have learned over the past few days that 2009 will bring not only a new boat to the lineup (216v), but will also take the 211 to a new entry-level buyer. It has been confirmed by a couple of dealers that the '09 211 will be moved to the more 'afordable' end of the market through limiting the options you can place on the 211 (keyed ignition, single hull color, few upgrades), reducing the margin to dealers and thus keeping the total price below $50K. The idea being that if a buyer wants a fully-optioned 211 (think TE), they will gravitate toward the 216v.
I think this is a colossal mistake by CC - so much so that I am backing off a purchase of a 2008 211 this week until the product line strategy is better understood. It seems CC is not paying attention to the dozens of industries that have learned this lesson the hard way - manage your product extensions appropriately and NEVER, under any circumstances, cheapen the value of an existing model. At the very least it creates confusion. At most, it could negatively impact values of pre-'09 211s - the same boat that has out-sold all other models combined... I suspect there are those that will argue that this will provide increasing price pressure on existing models - the truth is, nobody knows - and a pretty big gamble CC to make against a loyal base of customers.
My question: is this a common practice by CC? Are there other examples of prior years where the company decided to keep the same model while forcing down its initial value in the marketplace?
Comment