This thread is great. I feel like I'm reading the script to some TV series drama. I don't know Lvnspeed personally, but you always want to give people the benefit of the doubt. The perception of the events are difficult because of the timeline with regard to selling the boat and the price he paid for it does have that smell of intent to deceive, which is really the only track record he really has (making it difficult to give benefit of doubt). The three days under water is not exactly clear or important. I think he said it could have been under water for three days given the last time they recall seeing the boat vs. noticing it's dissappearance. If someone in fact tried to steal the boat, it could have happened only hours before they noticed it. His description about finding the boat and bringing it up is totally believable; oil/gas/liquids coming to surface, air trapped in bow enough to rest it nose up, but not bring it to the surface, winching it up and draining.
I have an aquantance (not a friend) that went on vacation a few years ago. He is one of those super CHEAP suckers that is always trying to save a dime at the expense of others. Anyway, when he left he turned off his furnace because he didn't want to pay to heat the house while they were gone. It was extremely cold that week and when they returned the house had flooded due to pipes freezing inside the house. When the insurance adjuster inspected the place, he told the guy that he couldn't remember what he set the temperature at (knowing good and well that he in fact turned it OFF). Anyway, he manipulated the facts of his personal blunder to force the insurance company to pay for it. Whenever someone mentions his name, that is the first thing I think of...he's a coniving cheat and lier and I wouldn't trust him with anything. The insurance company shelled out thousands to repair the house, all because he told the adjust a lie that was too difficult to verify.
The thing is, although many pieces of the story are completely comprehendible, the whole thing put together has a bunch of gaps that people are interpreting as potential intent to deceive. I'm not accusing at all (again benefit of doubt always), but a person could just as easily forget to put the plug in (I've done it twice personally) but this time the boat really does sink. You try to revive the boat as best you can but once you realize that you're screwed, you combine truths and falacies to present your case to insurance and wha-la...someone else has paid for your blunder. I say this not as an accusation, but rather a justification for why others (including myself) are so intruiged with the whole thing and we want to see the outcome of the script.
Quote: There is only one way to achieve happiness on this terrestrial ball, and that is to have a clear conscience or none at all. Ogden Nash
I have an aquantance (not a friend) that went on vacation a few years ago. He is one of those super CHEAP suckers that is always trying to save a dime at the expense of others. Anyway, when he left he turned off his furnace because he didn't want to pay to heat the house while they were gone. It was extremely cold that week and when they returned the house had flooded due to pipes freezing inside the house. When the insurance adjuster inspected the place, he told the guy that he couldn't remember what he set the temperature at (knowing good and well that he in fact turned it OFF). Anyway, he manipulated the facts of his personal blunder to force the insurance company to pay for it. Whenever someone mentions his name, that is the first thing I think of...he's a coniving cheat and lier and I wouldn't trust him with anything. The insurance company shelled out thousands to repair the house, all because he told the adjust a lie that was too difficult to verify.
The thing is, although many pieces of the story are completely comprehendible, the whole thing put together has a bunch of gaps that people are interpreting as potential intent to deceive. I'm not accusing at all (again benefit of doubt always), but a person could just as easily forget to put the plug in (I've done it twice personally) but this time the boat really does sink. You try to revive the boat as best you can but once you realize that you're screwed, you combine truths and falacies to present your case to insurance and wha-la...someone else has paid for your blunder. I say this not as an accusation, but rather a justification for why others (including myself) are so intruiged with the whole thing and we want to see the outcome of the script.
Quote: There is only one way to achieve happiness on this terrestrial ball, and that is to have a clear conscience or none at all. Ogden Nash
Comment