If a guy was so inclined and cost was not an issue, could a 2005 196 be upgraded with ZOff? A guy at the lake the other day was insisting it could happen with a change to the electronics in that boat. I was under the previous understanding that it can't be done.
X
-
RE: Zero Off on Non TBW boat
Sure it can be done. Needs new ecm, complete engine harness, dash harness, throttle body, throttle/shifter control, throttle harness, plus the zero off. If it's a limited you'll also have to change the gateway and gauges tot he 07+. You're talking over $8k in parts before labor.Shane Hill
2014 Team 200OB
67 '13 Prophecy
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ati_DudeI was under the impression that Zero Off was planning on releasing a version that was compatible with non DBW boats so 2007 and younger. Has anyone else heard this, I can remember where I heard it...?2001 Air Nautique
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MHayesOriginally posted by Ati_DudeI was under the impression that Zero Off was planning on releasing a version that was compatible with non DBW boats so 2007 and younger. Has anyone else heard this, I can remember where I heard it...?1997 Ski Nautique
Comment
-
-
Who else is displeased with this zero off issue? Here I have a 2005 196 that I paid a premium for due to its quality and durability and now it's obsolete for tournament use and practice. What's even more frustrating is that CC was a major influence in the introduction of ZO to the market. This is not the first time a sanctioning body has come under the influence of a manufacturer. What rational reason did AWSA have to limit tournaments to ZO? I'd love to know. Otherwise, it appears as though the rule was implemented not to help skiers, but to aid manufacturers, including CC and the folks that manufacturer ZO speed control. Unless you look at it from the manufacturers' perspective, it sure seems to wag the dog to force skiers that have perfectly good boats to buy new boats for speed control.
Maybe I'm just cranky this morning. Sorry for the rant.
Comment
-
-
Well, we've had over a year to be displeased since the patent swap and agreement that gave us only ZO in 07 and newer boats. I'm over it now and resigned to buy a zo boat. Sold my 05 last week and hope to have the new boat in the next 3-4 weeks.Shane Hill
2014 Team 200OB
67 '13 Prophecy
Comment
-
-
My understanding is that all AWSA tourneys are limited now to ZOff. If I'm wrong, then forget about my rant and I'll back off on my manufacturer/sanctioning body antitrust complaint that I'm preparing...
Ha!
I hear ya Shane. Are you getting Mark's boat? I'm sure that's a sweet boat. So is Clemson Dave's boat. Are you at all tempted to plunk down cash on a 200?
Comment
-
-
It is a complicated issue. AWSA has never mandated the use of ZO or PP. All they do is approve/deny boats provided by the manufacturers. PP/SG is allowed according to AWSA. However, all new promo boats (starting in '09) only have ZO (unless the owner purchased SG separately). This is a choice by the manufacturers (and the agreement between ZO and PP).
SGY, I agree that it sucks that you cannot put ZO in boats that are only 4-5 years old. On the other hand, I see people come to tons of tournaments that have boats that are 10+ yrs old. Of course, to each their own, but these boats are built so well that they are lasting forever. This reduces the market place for promo boats. If promo boats don't sell, you eventually will not find them at tournaments. Then what do we do? If we want to ski behind brand new boats at tournaments, everyone needs to step up. If that is not the case, then the rules for how old of a boat can be used needs to be changed and we'll need to figure out how to compensate individuals for bringing a boat.
It will cost me over $10k to stay in the program this year. I'll probably sell my baby (750hp vette) to offset this cost. I know of many guys that are dropping out of the program (probably smarter than me). I do it so I will get to ski behind a Nautique at tournaments and so I can help the ski community. Then I get tons of emails saying mine has too many hours. I bet I've had well over 50 in the year I have been trying to sell it. Pretty frustrating.
This discussion is happening on the local, regional and national level. I think everyone is recognizing we are headed for a train wreck.Promo Team member
1999 196
2003 196 Limited 2003 196 Limited
2008 196 Limited 2008 196 Limited
2010 200 Team 2010 200 Team
2011 200 Team 2011 200 Team
2012 200 Team - 2012 200 Team
2013 200 Team - 2013 200 Team
2014 200 Team - 2014 200 Team
2015 200 Team - on the way
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment