32' off behind the 2010 Ski Nauitque 200

[Big_Air_Dado]

During the recent US Nationals, Correct Craft had a 2010 SN200 on the slalom practice lake. The 22 off hump is less than 1/2 of the 196's. Awesome new hull!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVXyT28gC5s

Thought everyone would enjoy the vid of my son's 32' off pass.

[SGY]

RE: 32

How are the rest of the line lengths--especially 15 and 28 off?

[Big_Air_Dado]

RE: 32

We didn't ski 15 off, but 28' was the same as 32 and 35. My son get into 38, but didn't practice that length during this set.

[east tx skier]

RE: 32

That is absolutely crazy how quiet it is.

[ScarletArrow]

Re: 32' off behind the 2010 Ski Nauitque 200

During the recent US Nationals, Correct Craft had a 2010 SN200 on the slalom practice lake. The 22 off hump is less than 1/2 of the 196's. Awesome new hull!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVXyT28gC5s

Thought everyone would enjoy the vid of my son's 32' off pass.

-15 is much flatter and softer compared to the current 196, even at slower speeds (tested this myself).

Numerous skiers have said there is a small bump at -28.

[SNMike]

RE: Re: 32

The tracking of the ski through the wake is IMPRESSIVE!!!

[TravisFling]

RE: Re: 32

looks nice!!!

[zapada]

RE: Re: 32

Cool. Thanks for the video.

[Bimmerboyz]

What boat ever made has the smallest wake for Slaloming.

MC or SN

[east tx skier]

Speed and line length are going to be the factors to consider with this question. I ski long line and lower speeds.

The 200 looks pretty amazing, but I haven't skied it.
TSC1, 2, and 3 SN/196's are incredible. The difference between the wakes of these three hulls at my level are minimal.
91--94 PS 190 is great, but there is a touch of a bump.
95--97 PS 190/98--2004 Sportstar/Skier19 are very nice, but not as good as the 91--94 190 IMO.


I've skied a 1997 and 2002 Response as well. Nice ski wake, but I don't remember liking it more than the SN.

[oldslalomskier]

#1 - TSC/2
#2 - Diamond hull Response (LX)