200 booked thru December!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 2gofaster
    Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
    • May 2008
    • 671

    • Stevenson Lake-Conroe, Texas


    #91
    Originally posted by oldslalomskier
    Originally posted by 2gofaster
    I absolutely think the mfr's need an economy ski boat. Something that retails in the $32-35k range with a base single axle trailer and ZO. Something without a rear seat, no coming pads, analog gauges, etc. Just a drivers seat, observer's seat, and ZO.
    Uhh..
    CC 176 - failed
    MC Sportstar - no longer made - failed
    Malibu Sportster - no longer made
    Original Malibu response - Upgraded to Echeclon and old shell dropped

    And all the other low cost boats... TigerTrax, Sugar Sands, Aztec etc.

    And in modern times, how many Axis WB boats do you see?
    Different economic times. How many $70k wakeboard boats are going out the door now at the dealers?
    Shane Hill
    2014 Team 200OB
    67 '13 Prophecy

    Comment

    • wtrskii3156
      • May 2006
      • 39

      • Virginia


      #92
      Did I hear somewhere that at 34 mph the engine is running at 4000rpm?

      Comment

      • 2gofaster
        Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
        • May 2008
        • 671

        • Stevenson Lake-Conroe, Texas


        #93
        Yes, it is.
        Shane Hill
        2014 Team 200OB
        67 '13 Prophecy

        Comment

        • oldslalomskier
          • Aug 2009
          • 131



          #94
          With a gear reduction tranny that sounds about right although I suspect differnt propping should bring that down substantially.

          Comment

          • oldslalomskier
            • Aug 2009
            • 131



            #95
            Originally posted by 2gofaster
            Originally posted by oldslalomskier
            Originally posted by 2gofaster
            I absolutely think the mfr's need an economy ski boat. Something that retails in the $32-35k range with a base single axle trailer and ZO. Something without a rear seat, no coming pads, analog gauges, etc. Just a drivers seat, observer's seat, and ZO.
            Uhh..
            CC 176 - failed
            MC Sportstar - no longer made - failed
            Malibu Sportster - no longer made
            Original Malibu response - Upgraded to Echeclon and old shell dropped

            And all the other low cost boats... TigerTrax, Sugar Sands, Aztec etc.

            And in modern times, how many Axis WB boats do you see?
            Different economic times. How many $70k wakeboard boats are going out the door now at the dealers?
            Malibu dealers in my area all sold out. dozens and dozens of boats.

            Comment

            • j2nh
              Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
              • Dec 2003
              • 628

              • Spread Eagle Wisconsin


              #96
              Originally posted by oldslalomskier
              With a gear reduction tranny that sounds about right although I suspect differnt propping should bring that down substantially.
              Wouldn't that be at the expense of already mediocre acceleration?
              2018 200 Team H6
              2009 196 Team ZR 409
              2005 196 Limited ZR 375
              2003 196 Limited Excalibur
              1999 196 Masters Edition
              1995 ProStar 190 LT1 (Bayliner)
              1987 ProStar 190

              Comment

              • oldslalomskier
                • Aug 2009
                • 131



                #97
                I duno - what is the 0-36 time? If the thing passed the AWSA tests it couldn't be that bad, could it?

                Comment

                • DanielC
                  1,000 Post Club Member
                  • Nov 2005
                  • 2669

                  • West Linn OR

                  • 1997 Ski Nautique

                  #98
                  The gear reduction transmission does not effect the top speed of the boat. Here is why. The propeller has a higher pitch, it moves farther forward for each revolution, but turns slower. If you take the pitch of a propeller on a Ski Nautique (16) and divide it by the gear ratio, (1.23) you end up with 13.008. A lot of ski boats with 1 to 1 transmissions are running a 13 pitch prop.
                  The gear reduction transmission does gain two things, A right hand propeller, with a clockwise turning engine, and you gain a little efficiency. The propeller pushes the boat farther forward with each revolution, and does not spend as much time spinning.
                  Top speed of a boat is about 80% hull design, and about 20% motor.
                  I have driven a 1999 Ski Nautique, with the 502 Python motor. The boat was new, so I did not hold WOT very long, but it went right up to 53 MPH, indicated on the speedos. Not much faster than my 1997 Ski Nautique, about 45. But it was a whole lot quicker. About a third more horsepower, for 8 MPH.

                  Comment

                  • MikeC
                    Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 535

                    • Georgia

                    • 1999 Ski Nautique (Python powered) 2017 GS22 (sold) 2005 SV211 (sold)

                    #99
                    Originally posted by oldslalomskier
                    Originally posted by 2gofaster
                    Originally posted by oldslalomskier
                    Originally posted by 2gofaster
                    I absolutely think the mfr's need an economy ski boat. Something that retails in the $32-35k range with a base single axle trailer and ZO. Something without a rear seat, no coming pads, analog gauges, etc. Just a drivers seat, observer's seat, and ZO.
                    Uhh..
                    CC 176 - failed
                    MC Sportstar - no longer made - failed
                    Malibu Sportster - no longer made
                    Original Malibu response - Upgraded to Echeclon and old shell dropped

                    And all the other low cost boats... TigerTrax, Sugar Sands, Aztec etc.

                    And in modern times, how many Axis WB boats do you see?
                    Different economic times. How many $70k wakeboard boats are going out the door now at the dealers?
                    Malibu dealers in my area all sold out. dozens and dozens of boats.
                    This intrigued me, so I went by my local Mastercraft and Malibu dealers just to find out how many boats the have sitting around. The Malibu dealer has 12 '09 models and a couple of '10 models all wakeboard boats. Now the Mastercraft dealer lends some confirmation of a previous post that the factory is dumping their inventory, the Mastercraft dealer has 24 wakeboard boats sitting there, most are X45's with a few X30's and X80's. That's a lot of inventory even for this area. Just for comparison I went by the Nautique dealer and they only had one used 210, they're waiting for the '10 models to be delivered. Oldslalomskier, I don't know where you're located but it looks like your dealers are pretty lucky.

                    Comment

                    • 2gofaster
                      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                      • May 2008
                      • 671

                      • Stevenson Lake-Conroe, Texas


                      MikeC, My local dealers have almost identical numbers to you. There are no less than 25 wakeboard boats sitting on the MC lot, all with price tags starting in the high 50s up to high 70s. I'm guessing with that floorplan nut to carry, he's wishing the boats were cheaper now.
                      Shane Hill
                      2014 Team 200OB
                      67 '13 Prophecy

                      Comment

                      • oldslalomskier
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 131



                        Actually, I lied - the one large dealer has a single 09 Malibu 247 (that's the 24 ft boat) still available. As for MC, yeah, there are lots of them; spec ordering did not work out this year. CC's strategy of underbuilding as usual worked out.

                        Comment

                        • MikeC
                          Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 535

                          • Georgia

                          • 1999 Ski Nautique (Python powered) 2017 GS22 (sold) 2005 SV211 (sold)

                          Underbuilding, or managing inventory....I guess it depends on the perspective.

                          Comment

                          • oldslalomskier
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 131



                            With the limitations imposed by the old factory, I'm not sure it could be called active management. Of course in the new facorty they still had layoffs (wasn't it about a hundred in July?) which is bad, but not as bad a some other builders.

                            Comment

                            • Hollywood
                              1,000 Post Club Member
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 1930

                              • WIIL


                              Why build a larger facility if you don't need it?

                              A basic assumption would be they didn't build the new factory until they were interested in building more XXX.

                              Comment

                              • oldslalomskier
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 131



                                One reason for the new factory was to get around having to wet sand each and every boat due to air quailty issues. The fact CC was able to product great boats out of the old place was amazing.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X