454 vs 351

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gnarlydude
    • Apr 2010
    • 42
    • Lake Springfield

    • Springfield, IL

    • 95 Sport Nautique

    454 vs 351

    What can you guys tell me about boats with difference in power/handling/fuel consumption/worth of nautiques with the 454 vs the 351?
  • WakeSlayer
    1,000 Post Club Member
    • Sep 2005
    • 2069

    • Silver Creek, MN

    • 1968 Mustang

    #2
    Provided the boat is in good shape, go for the big block!!!

    I think the fuel consumption difference is negligible. Power is enhanced, handling is not really different. It weighs a little more. What boat? BFN ? There were not too many SN's made with
    454's, but they are out there occasionally.
    the WakeSlayer
    1999 Super Air - Python Powered <-- For Sale
    1968 Correct Craft Mustang

    Comment

    • Nautiquehunter
      1,000 Post Club Member
      • Jun 2008
      • 2080

      • Flowery Branch GA Lake Lanier

      • 2008 210 SANTE 67 Correct Craft Mustang

      #3
      The only advantage I know is the extra speed for bare footing. The only disadvantage is fuel consumption.
      That being said the only thing I wished I had in my 89 Sunsport over the past 21 years is the 454. You can always throttle down.

      Comment

      • GodFather
        • Apr 2010
        • 1


        • Super Air 230

        #4
        Originally posted by gnarlydude View Post
        What can you guys tell me about boats with difference in power/handling/fuel consumption/worth of nautiques with the 454 vs the 351?
        Go for the 454.More midrange torque which comes in pretty handy when you fill the big old tub with ballast

        Comment

        • TRBenj
          1,000 Post Club Member
          • May 2005
          • 1681

          • NWCT


          #5
          Originally posted by WakeSlayer View Post
          I think the fuel consumption difference is negligible. Power is enhanced, handling is not really different. It weighs a little more. What boat? BFN ? There were not too many SN's made with
          454's, but they are out there occasionally.
          I bet there are more 2001's with 454's out there than there are BFN's with the 351w! Thats just a guess though.

          The key here is the weight difference. There is a difference of about 250 lbs between the 351w and 454. If youre wakeboarding, the weight increase is a good thing- if youre slaloming, its not!

          I own boats with both engines, and I have to say I would lean towards the 351w for most uses... but both are good engines. The 351w is going to be a bit easier and cheaper to maintain, and will keep the boat lighter for slalom purposes. The 454 does not give much of a performance edge- Ive actually found it to be more sluggish out of the hole, probably due to the weight and the larger props they usually turn. They only hold a ~3-4 mph top end advantage on any given hull. Ive read from multiple sources that the 330hp marine 454 was really only good for 280-290hp on the dyno. The 351w has very strong low to midrange power, and when propped right will come out of the hole as good as anything. If barefooting, a few more mph on top would be nice for 1-footers (assuming a 240-255hp base engine), but that is easily solved with a top end (H/C/I) upgrade.
          1990 Ski Nautique
          NWCT

          Comment

          • WakeSlayer
            1,000 Post Club Member
            • Sep 2005
            • 2069

            • Silver Creek, MN

            • 1968 Mustang

            #6
            I had one of those oddities. a BFN with a 351w in it. 1992 V-drive.
            the WakeSlayer
            1999 Super Air - Python Powered <-- For Sale
            1968 Correct Craft Mustang

            Comment

            Working...
            X