I got a nice email from Nautique.com about the 2012 230 with the subject "The All New 2012 Super Air Nautique 230" with information and links to the Nautique website. But, the website only mentions the 2011 one. There mail and internet marketing seems to be out of sync.
X
-
I'm personally not a fan of CC's marketing in general. When I watch the promo videos on the website, I think (a) who the heck wrote the cheesy monologue, and (b) the guy reading the cheesy monologue has no idea what he is talking about and probably has never ridden behind a boat of any kind.Now
2000 SAN
Previously
1999 Air Nautique
1996 Tige Pre-2000
1989 Lowe 24' Pontoon / Johnson 100HP outboard
Comment
-
Their print ads in wakeboarding mag and alliance are the worst, i think just the picture above of the side of the 230 in an action shot with no words would be better than what they use. The current ones look like a fact sheet and usually dont even show the boat in the water in action...-Jon
16 G23
07 220 TE
05 211 TE
95 SS (210)
89 SN
Comment
-
You guys kill me....so negative all the time!!!! This is a Nautique site and I think I hear more negative thoughts/opinions about Nautiques than I would if I were on a MC or Malibu site..............Come on!Last edited by nautique06; 08-26-2011, 08:20 PM.
Comment
-
It's because, while skiing and boarding boats have never been cheap, they have increased in price so much it's astounding. And you would think certain pn members would be part of a yearly focus group, but nope. I think the loyalty goes slightly unappreciated by cc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nautique06 View PostYou guys kill me....so negative all the time!!!! This is a Nautique site and I think I hear more negative thoughts/opinions about Nautiques than I would if I were on a MC or Malibu site..............Come on!
The sad part in the add above is so much attention drawn to the crest and chromax numbers. Perhaps some Yankee marketing firm figured out that's what sells.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AirTool View PostQ: who washes their boat BEFORE they use it? you got it.
Comment
-
I love Nautiques. I just think CC's ads are cheesy. I'm not negative all the time. We are giving CC a clue by telling them what we do and do not like. CC should take note.Now
2000 SAN
Previously
1999 Air Nautique
1996 Tige Pre-2000
1989 Lowe 24' Pontoon / Johnson 100HP outboard
Comment
-
I would love to see the new 230's despite of the cheesy adds. I do not own a CC yet. I am waiting for my business to turn around. Soon though. I also have to sell my other boat, which will be no problem. Many offers already. One thing I really do not want to see is the all digital dash. I personally like the gauges along with the dash. Just like last year. We'll see. Does anyone know when the reveal will come out?
Comment
-
Scott
By saying those, do you mean SC. If so, The reason i want to get rid of it is because of the bags. I hate the bags. The one biggest question about the boat is "How is the wake?" My wife water skies and does not like a big wake. I need to convince her that it has a descent skiing wake. I know that the Hydrogate will help that out a bit, and possibly some extra bow weight. I hope to see what the dash looks like in the 230 very soon. I also want to make arrangements to test one out. Like I said, I need to convince the wife in letting me get a new boat.
Mark
Comment
-
Yes, we had 4 different SC boats before going Nautique. Can't speak to the 230 but the 200V is what we bought because between all of our kids, they literally do everything. Slalom, trick, wakeboard, jump, barefoot, surf, etc. The 200V has an incredibly flat wake for skiing and then a respectable wake for the rest. It has the tanks so no bags. It's not quite as big as the 230 but a ton cheaper and does everything well. We love it.
If your wife drives your LSV (we had a 2006), let her drive a Nautique and it will be a done deal.2011 200V - First Nautique
Comment
Comment