I have heard the concern is not lateral forces since that would be equivalent to pulling a skier but the vertical torque that could actually pull the pylon from its base. You do have to rotate the pylon to remove it so it is hard to image it could rotate while the boom is connected. Have any CC engineers looked into this? Or who manufactures the removable pylon for CC? they might know.
X
-
have they made tower mounted booms for the new towers? If so, that would be the way to go.
-
You have to push down and then a slight twist. I don't think you'll get CC to say it's ok to mount a boom as they already say not to in the owners manual I'm sure simply to avoid liability. Hard to imagine you could get the downward force and the twist needed to unlock it as long as your cables are taught but I'm still not sure I would put one on our boat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 81nautique View PostYou have to push down and then a slight twist. I don't think you'll get CC to say it's ok to mount a boom as they already say not to in the owners manual I'm sure simply to avoid liability. Hard to imagine you could get the downward force and the twist needed to unlock it as long as your cables are taught but I'm still not sure I would put one on our boat.Peace..
Comment
-
I would like to know the specs (pull capacity in #) for the three tow points on the 200V (FCT3, removable pylon and rear lift ring). Anyone know this information or where it might be published? Also, what is the spec on the permanent pylon for the DD (196 or 200)....compared to the removable???Peace..
Comment
-
Originally posted by 81nautique View PostYou have to push down and then a slight twist. I don't think you'll get CC to say it's ok to mount a boom as they already say not to in the owners manual I'm sure simply to avoid liability. Hard to imagine you could get the downward force and the twist needed to unlock it as long as your cables are taught but I'm still not sure I would put one on our boat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DLarva View PostI can't imagine this happening. Besides the cables attached to it, you have the tower itself, which it presses against, preventing it from moving backwards and twisting the pylon. If you could apply forward pressure, and you had the boom on the right side of the boat, perhaps it could twist. But how would you ever put more forward pressure on it than backwards pressure. I think it should be pretty safe.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 81nautique View PostHave you ever had a footer fall and not let go right away? The boom can spring forward and bounce up and down quite a bit. Not saying it could be enough to disengage the pylon but not sure it's impossible either. You'll just have to let us know how yours works ok.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 81nautique View PostHave you ever had a footer fall and not let go right away? The boom can spring forward and bounce up and down quite a bit. Not saying it could be enough to disengage the pylon but not sure it's impossible either. You'll just have to let us know how yours works ok.
It would also have to snap the rope attached to the rear cleat.
If it is on the port side it would also have to break whatever system prevents the pylon from turning the wrong direction and/or the attachment to the pylon. If it is on the starboard side it would have to break whatever prevents it from twisting unless it is first pressed down on and/or the attachment to the pylon.
I suppose this is all possible.
Hopefully the odds are about as low as the odds of hitting something while skiing or the rope snapping and shooting into the boat injuring someone, etc.
I'll certainly try and test this out at slower speeds first though and report back if the results are troublesome.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DLarva View PostSo you guys are saying that when the footer falls and hangs on, the boom bends, then they get pulled off, and then the boom springs forward and potentially with enough force to swing around and hit the windshield?
It would also have to snap the rope attached to the rear cleat.
If it is on the port side it would also have to break whatever system prevents the pylon from turning the wrong direction and/or the attachment to the pylon. If it is on the starboard side it would have to break whatever prevents it from twisting unless it is first pressed down on and/or the attachment to the pylon.
I suppose this is all possible.
Hopefully the odds are about as low as the odds of hitting something while skiing or the rope snapping and shooting into the boat injuring someone, etc.
I'll certainly try and test this out at slower speeds first though and report back if the results are troublesome.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sodbuster88 View PostAlso, what is the spec on the permanent pylon for the DD (196 or 200)....compared to the removable???1997 Ski Nautique
Comment
Comment