SN 200 Pro for High Altitude

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qstufflebeam
    • Nov 2007
    • 74

    • Location


    #1

    SN 200 Pro for High Altitude

    Any one have any suggestions for propping a SN 200 with a 409 at 6500 ft? I am currently running the 422. The boat is a dog out of the hole. When I bought the boat I upgraded the motor to avoid the issues at higher elevations. Maybe I made the wrong choice in engine size. I wonder how bad the 343 would be at this elevation.
    2012 200 Team 409
    2008 196 ltd
    2002 196
  • DanielC
    1,000 Post Club Member
    • Nov 2005
    • 2669

    • West Linn OR

    • 1997 Ski Nautique

    #2
    Engines lose 3 percent of their horsepower per 1000 feet of altitude. At your altitude, either engine is down about 20 percent. There is also the issue of the Ski Nautique 200 not having the same performance as the Ski Nautique 196.

    Comment

    • dski
      • Jul 2011
      • 73

      • Utah

      • 2004 Nautique 206 2007 Nautique 236

      #3
      While not a 200, I have a 206 and had to prop down due to elevation. What is your RPM at WOT?

      I have a 2004 206 with the 330. The pull out at 4600ft was a bit soft for my liking so I went to the 1868 and had them add some cup to it. The 422 was giving me about 4650 RPM WOT and the 1868 was at 5100 RPM stock. I sent the ACME 1868 back and they added some cup to the prop (.50) and now it pulls almost exactly 5000 RPM and the hole shot is fantastic. Top speed went from 44 down to 42. Adds about 300-350 RPM at ski speeds. Super happy with it.

      Comment

      • Rick
        1,000 Post Club Member
        • Mar 2004
        • 1250

        • San Diego, Ca

        • 1962 Keaton Utility. 2000 Ski 1965 Barracuda

        #4
        At 6500 feet (Lake Tahoe) we always pitched down 2 sizes. If you are running a 14 X 15.5 you would go to a 14 X 13.5.
        Nautiqueless in San Diego

        Comment

        • TRBenj
          1,000 Post Club Member
          • May 2005
          • 1681

          • NWCT


          #5
          Like the question was asked before, how many RPM's are you turning at WOT with the 422 right now? That would give us an indication of how far you can prop down and still get respectable top end (ie, keep the boat near, but not up against the 5600rpm rev limiter).
          1990 Ski Nautique
          NWCT

          Comment

          • qstufflebeam
            • Nov 2007
            • 74

            • Location


            #6
            Does the RPM number at WOT need to be taken at 6500 elevation? The reason I ask is I only use the boat on that lake four times a year. Most of my skiing is done at 4500 feet.
            2012 200 Team 409
            2008 196 ltd
            2002 196

            Comment

            • dski
              • Jul 2011
              • 73

              • Utah

              • 2004 Nautique 206 2007 Nautique 236

              #7
              To get maximum performance at that altitude, yes. If you are mostly using it at 4500 feet, you should do the WOT test there. My guess is that you will benefit from the 1868 even at 4500.

              I would give it a WOT test at 4500 and tune for that.

              Comment

              • TRBenj
                1,000 Post Club Member
                • May 2005
                • 1681

                • NWCT


                #8
                Originally posted by dski View Post
                To get maximum performance at that altitude, yes. If you are mostly using it at 4500 feet, you should do the WOT test there. I would give it a WOT test at 4500 and tune for that.
                I agree.

                I think its too early to speculate which prop would work best for this particular boat at this particular altitude... there are many props available that would help dial in the RPM's.
                1990 Ski Nautique
                NWCT

                Comment

                Working...
                X