1995 vs 1997 Ski Nautique

[newfoundskier]

I know the hull changed in 97 to the TSC. How do the slalom wakes compare? Thanks.

[Adrian]

RE: 1995 vs 1997 Ski Nautique

I own a 98 and one of my buddys a 96. So I know very well both wakes.
I can tell you the wakes of the TSC are much much better for slalom. In fact when CC launched the TSC hull world slalom records started to fall like mature apples...

[SGY]

RE: 1995 vs 1997 Ski Nautique

The wakes behind the 97-2001 SN are sweet. The difference is fairly significant. I would say more than noticeable.

[CHassmann]

Re: RE: 1995 vs 1997 Ski Nautique

The wakes behind the 97-2001 SN are sweet. The difference is fairly significant. I would say more than noticeable.

Ditto. Even sweeter with on '02 or newer. :grin:

[Blue Ski]

RE: Re: RE: 1995 vs 1997 Ski Nautique

You may want to check out these recent posts asking the same question. The 97+ is sweet, but the 95's are not bad at all.
http://www.planetnautique.com/index....ewtopic&t=2920

[Mikeski]

RE: Re: RE: 1995 vs 1997 Ski Nautique

My last boat was a 1995, really nice well built boat and great on almost all accounts. Now, to be very picky, I hated the steering from day one, always hard to straight back out from a left turn. The boat never really liked going straight, tended to hunt left or right. With 3 people in the front bow dips were hard to avoid. If I were in the market I would look at 1992, 1993, 1997, 1998, and I would avoid the years between. Choosing the earlier years if wakeboarding is in the mix.

my two cents.