7.3 will pull anything you want in a very good fashion. Have a lot of friends that have them and swear by them. Arguably the best motor ford has put in there trucks. If you think the 7.3 is load you ought to hear a older 12 valve cummins. You have to turn the truck off if you want to talk to somebody.
X
-
Not to derail any further I have a 7.3 and love it, pulls like a champ. Not the fastest but a programmer or juice/attitude wakes it up alot with out worrying about nuking the trans. They are loud, especially with any aftermarket filter system and exhaust.
I would not trade mine for anything when it comes to pulling/longevity.
Of course any of you G owners will not be looking to buy a 10+ year old truck. Personally I would not buy any diesel truck that does not have a solid front axel.
As far as the OP question obviously how far and what kind of terrain will impact what you can tow with.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jsta281 View PostPersonally I would not buy any diesel truck that does not have a solid front axel.
Originally posted by bharris6 View PostIf you think the 7.3 is load you ought to hear a older 12 valve cummins. You have to turn the truck off if you want to talk to somebody.
If I was to go for a new truck it would be a hard choice between the Ford 6.7 or the GM LML. The are both amazing engines.1997 Ski Nautique
Comment
-
BrennanK did not intend to offend, sounds like you have had great success. I'm a Ford fan, but involved heavily with clubs that are GM fans. Lots of reports of front end failures/premature wearing if parts ect. Most of my GM Friends with GM cars that hate Ford drive Dodge diesels. Regardless, I don't see the point, rice quality is better no doubt but if buying a heavy duty tow rig I'd want a heavy duty front end. Ride quality is not that bad even in my old 7.3, Even my GM friends that have GM diesels, given the option would all have chosen a solid front if given the choice.
Too bad too because the duramax Allison combo is awesome.
Comment
-
-
I'm going to qualify my previous statement a tad after consulting my GM diesel brothers and the front end parts issue is referring to the pitman and idler wearing out, on leveled and lifted trucks.
I will also say that in my opinion if you are are pushed off or drive off the highway at highway speeds towing a heavy load you would be substantially better off with a solid front axel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bharris6 View Post7.3 will pull anything you want in a very good fashion. Have a lot of friends that have them and swear by them. Arguably the best motor ford has put in there trucks. If you think the 7.3 is load you ought to hear a older 12 valve cummins. You have to turn the truck off if you want to talk to somebody.
Our bus has a 7.3 and it runs like a champ. Low miles but no engine problems thus far.
Ride lab is making me jealous with that new Ram!
A lot of my "redneck" friends in college would beat the pants off Duramax trucks and they took it all day long. Ford has always been the sore point in diesel technology other than the 7.3.Last edited by Zach@n3; 04-19-2013, 02:43 PM.[EMAIL="Zach@n3boatworks.com"]Zach@n3boatworks.com[/EMAIL]
Comment
-
Zach, I concur with the analysis of the Ford diesel tech minus the 7.3 L diesel. I understand the new generation is pretty solid as well. Avoid a ford 6 L diesel like the plague!
One more note on the GM diesel front suspension "issue" I understand that GM made some geometry/suspension upgrades to beef up the front suspension on the 2011 and newer diesel trucks, To address some of the front end failures in the older models
Comment
-
Every truck has its quirks. They get their butts worked off and problem areas will show. 4x4 Dodges eat u joints/ball joints. Ford diesel sucks. Chevys don't have solid axles. Just the nature of the use of the vehicle. If properly maintained things last much longer. Everyone talks about poor Dodge transmissions. My best friends dad always ran Cummins trucks. His last 2005 had about 260k of highway/towing most days and on job sites on it before the trans let go. Thats not bad considering all the same it would have required another transmission 520k miles. Manuals are a different story. Dodge got it together with the 07.5 on transmissions.
Haven't had enough experience with high mileage Fords and Chevies to know the interval in which the trans requires a rebuild.
Most all my "redneck" friends with Chevies were lifted and they performed the proper modifications to the front suspensions to prevent the common problems.
Personally I like to leave 2500-3500 suspension the way it was so it will do what it was designed to do best. Tow.[EMAIL="Zach@n3boatworks.com"]Zach@n3boatworks.com[/EMAIL]
Comment
-
Originally posted by nyryan2001 View PostIm not tracking a 5.7L engine for ford that year.... likely you had the 300hp 5.4L? if so, yes thats a little on the light side...
Tundra. 5.7L 390 HP... averages a meager 6-9mph while towing, and can maintain 70-75mph on flat highway reasonably and comfortably without down****fing unless you hit decent hills. I can get 8-10mpg if I use quality pure gas and feather the pedal. If I hammer it and in a hurry it I am at 5-6mpg ish. It IS a heavy tow and you DO feel decent kickback from the load when hitting bumps and such. with the 2 axel trailer I would decribe the braking as normal/adequate....it IS a heavy tow with the Tundra and you know it. You definitly need 4x4, as the rear tires are wet pulling it out and you will spin wheels even on a reasonable ramp incline pulling 8000lbs out of the drink. I would rate it a solid B for such a heavy load. If I could do a quick and easy swap... on great terms with trade, i'd jump to a GM or Ford diesel now. Did you just compare a tundra against an f150 for towing......wow. You haven't "driven a ford lately" huh?
Comment
-
Not sure what you are getting at. I wouldn't consider a Ford unless us was a newer diesel or the 6.2l. When I bought, all they had was the 5.4L. Not sold on the V6 ecoboost. I wouldn't consider a Ford 1/2 ton, not for me.
last nite I walked the Ford lot after they closed:
F250 diesel nicely equipped with leather, Nav etc: $60-63k msrp
F250 diesel less equipped with cloth seats $55-57k msrp2019 G23 450
2014 G23 550
2013 G23 450
2011 Malibu Wakesetter 247
2007 Yamaha AR210
Comment
-
Originally posted by nyryan2001 View PostNot sure what you are getting at. I wouldn't consider a Ford unless us was a newer diesel or the 6.2l. When I bought, all they had was the 5.4L. Not sold on the V6 ecoboost. I wouldn't consider a Ford 1/2 ton, not for me.
last nite I walked the Ford lot after they closed:
F250 diesel nicely equipped with leather, Nav etc: $60-63k msrp
F250 diesel less equipped with cloth seats $55-57k msrp
Comment
Comment