Be reminded as somebody else said on this forum, that most people that own these boats are not on this forum. So you cannot count based on this forum.
X
-
Originally posted by Kenv View PostFor sure GMLIII. That would be a Golden ticket right there. If I had to guess....I'd say 40 G23's....10 G21's....and 5 G25's of various model years...from 2013 to 2018. Also curious about any boats outside the U.S.....and if any were Coastal Edition with the James Bond submarine attack spinner feature.2019 SAN G23 | 2016 SAN G23 | 2013 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2008 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2003 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2000 Wakesetter VLX | 1998 Sanger V210 | 1994 Magic Sceptor 28 | 1985 Cole TR2 | Too many PWC to count!
Comment
-
-
1,000 Post Club Member
- Jan 2004
- 1070
- Texas
- 2021 G23 Previous 2015 G21 2010 226 2005 226 2000 Super Air
Well yeah......I was well above the count mentioned in this thread.....and being conservative a bit too. It would be one surprising number to find out.....higher or lower then my guess. Remember when this started....and some were screaming "it's just a couple...don't panic".....LOL
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Kenv View PostWell yeah......I was well above the count mentioned in this thread.....and being conservative a bit too. It would be one surprising number to find out.....higher or lower then my guess. Remember when this started....and some were screaming "it's just a couple...don't panic".....LOL2019 SAN G23 | 2016 SAN G23 | 2013 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2008 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2003 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2000 Wakesetter VLX | 1998 Sanger V210 | 1994 Magic Sceptor 28 | 1985 Cole TR2 | Too many PWC to count!
Comment
-
-
Much higher in my opinion too. I emailed everyone at Nautique I had an email address for and did get a call back. I don't think anyone would actually admit the failure rate to be honest with you, but it's high enough that they said they would continue to replace these under warranty even after the warranty expires. I'd like to see some more definitive documentation or statement that they will, but for now have to take his word. So that's definitely a positive for some that have these G's with expiring warranties.
"Supposedly" he said they have it figured out, but I'm not sure I'm buying it. He told me that they are just now shipping a new shaft from a completely new supplier. He said that they have been testing them extensively and have yet to break a shaft from the new supplier and have modified the keyway in the shaft somewhat. Whether that's the case or not we will just have to see. I'd like to believe it's true, but I feel like I've read a similar story on this thread earlier and obviously have my doubts.
Sent from my iPhone using PLT Nautique
Comment
-
-
I’m sure I’m the only one but I have a different opinion on this broken shaft issue. Sure it might have you stranded on the water or mess up a big weekend but in the grand scheme of things it is only one of many things that may and will break on any boat over time. A broken shaft is fairly uncommon and it’s a relatively quick fix. Nautique has repaired all shafts under warranty no matter the hours on the boat from what I have read on this forum. I have owned 5 G23’s and broke my first shaft at 495 hours on a 17. Of all the boat repairs I have had over the years this was one of the fastest repairs. I would like to see the problem eliminated by Nautique but I’m just saying how many people on this forum had had a problem that caused them to be stranded or take a boat in for repair.
Sent from my iPhone using PLT Nautique
Comment
-
-
I understand that you run the risk of a mechanical failure when going out on the water, but it is so much more than that when something is a known problem and there has been little perceived effort by Nautique to correct the problem. Just offering a replacement shaft hasn't been much of a solution in my opinion.
It's also not a quick fix for some that don't have a boat dealer close by. My closest dealer is 3.5 hours away. That's two 7 hour drives. That's two different 2.5 hour trips to go pick the boat up and drop it back off at the lake to put on the lift. None of it is the end of the world, but time is one of those things I can't ever seem to find enough of!
Sent from my iPhone using PLT Nautique
Comment
-
-
1,000 Post Club Member
- Jan 2004
- 1070
- Texas
- 2021 G23 Previous 2015 G21 2010 226 2005 226 2000 Super Air
Originally posted by jphdrake View PostI’m sure I’m the only one but I have a different opinion on this broken shaft issue. Sure it might have you stranded on the water or mess up a big weekend but in the grand scheme of things it is only one of many things that may and will break on any boat over time. A broken shaft is fairly uncommon and it’s a relatively quick fix. Nautique has repaired all shafts under warranty no matter the hours on the boat from what I have read on this forum. I have owned 5 G23’s and broke my first shaft at 495 hours on a 17. Of all the boat repairs I have had over the years this was one of the fastest repairs. I would like to see the problem eliminated by Nautique but I’m just saying how many people on this forum had had a problem that caused them to be stranded or take a boat in for repair.
Sent from my iPhone using PLT Nautique
Comment
-
Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
- Jun 2008
- 521
- Frisco, TX
- 2021 G23 2019 G23 (Sold) 2013 G25 550XR (Sold) 2009 216V (Sold)
The problem with this situation beside the actual failures is Nautique's silence. They would do their brand and reputation a huge favor if they would just issue a service bulletin, press release or something that acknowledges the failures, describes what the warranty process will be over the long term and explains what steps are or have been taken to address it. Throw in an apology for good measure and I think they could (or could have) turn what is a black eye into something that people respect how they handled it. I am not talking a novel or a recall but simply a one pager discussing the issue.
To me that seems like a good middle of the road approach. I think this thread would be alot shorter and many would quiet down about this. Admittedly that wouldn't satisfy everyone but I think a lot of folks would have respect for their approach and give them some grace. Sticking your head in the sand over a well documented product issue is simply not the right approach. Tackling it head on is the right approach.
Also if I was a dealer I would be hopping mad over their silence to the public. The dealers are on the front line and probably catching the most heat over this. That's a crappy position to be placed in over Nautique's unwillingness to say something public.
Comment
-
1,000 Post Club Member
- May 2013
- 2792
- Smith Mountain Lake, VA (Craddock Creek area)
- 2017 G23 Coastal Edition H6 | 2001 Sport Nautique | 1981 Ski Nautique
Originally posted by Bevostein View PostThe problem with this situation beside the actual failures is Nautique's silence. They would do their brand and reputation a huge favor if they would just issue a service bulletin, press release or something that acknowledges the failures, describes what the warranty process will be over the long term and explains what steps are or have been taken to address it. Throw in an apology for good measure and I think they could (or could have) turn what is a black eye into something that people respect how they handled it. I am not talking a novel or a recall but simply a one pager discussing the issue.
To me that seems like a good middle of the road approach. I think this thread would be alot shorter and many would quiet down about this. Admittedly that wouldn't satisfy everyone but I think a lot of folks would have respect for their approach and give them some grace. Sticking your head in the sand over a well documented product issue is simply not the right approach. Tackling it head on is the right approach.
Also if I was a dealer I would be hopping mad over their silence to the public. The dealers are on the front line and probably catching the most heat over this. That's a crappy position to be placed in over Nautique's unwillingness to say something public.
Comment
-
1,000 Post Club Member
- Jan 2004
- 1070
- Texas
- 2021 G23 Previous 2015 G21 2010 226 2005 226 2000 Super Air
Great point Bevo.....and let me add....this is not just affecting the owners that this has already happened to once and even twice...but as someone mentioned previously....EVERY time they take out their G23 or even G21 they have to "worry" about a shaft breaking. Why should a Nautique owner have to even have this on his mind now. Kinda puts a cloud on every outing away from the ramp or dock thinking...is this my day??? ****....I like to take fall and winter rides just to run it and sometimes there is rarely another boat out there. Sucks to have to think about calling someone out just to come get you. And YES...I know "other" things can happen to a boat...but right here right now i'm talking just shaft failure on the Nautique G series.
Comment
-
1,000 Post Club Member
- Apr 2015
- 1295
- Martinez, GA/Lake Greenwood, SC
- 2017 GS20 Previous: 2011 SAN 210, 2007 Malibu Wakesetter 23LSV, 1995 Cobalt 200
Originally posted by SoCal G-Man View Post
I believe it is much higher. Keep in mind... Most G owners I have met are not active on our forums.
There are at least 5 G owners and several other Nautique/Correct Craft owners on my home lake and I'm the only active PN member that I'm aware of.2007 Malibu Wakesetter 23 LSV, 1995 Cobalt 200
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bevostein View PostThe problem with this situation beside the actual failures is Nautique's silence. They would do their brand and reputation a huge favor if they would just issue a service bulletin, press release or something that acknowledges the failures, describes what the warranty process will be over the long term and explains what steps are or have been taken to address it. Throw in an apology for good measure and I think they could (or could have) turn what is a black eye into something that people respect how they handled it. I am not talking a novel or a recall but simply a one pager discussing the issue.
To me that seems like a good middle of the road approach. I think this thread would be alot shorter and many would quiet down about this. Admittedly that wouldn't satisfy everyone but I think a lot of folks would have respect for their approach and give them some grace. Sticking your head in the sand over a well documented product issue is simply not the right approach. Tackling it head on is the right approach.
Also if I was a dealer I would be hopping mad over their silence to the public. The dealers are on the front line and probably catching the most heat over this. That's a crappy position to be placed in over Nautique's unwillingness to say something public.
2019 SAN G23 | 2016 SAN G23 | 2013 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2008 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2003 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2000 Wakesetter VLX | 1998 Sanger V210 | 1994 Magic Sceptor 28 | 1985 Cole TR2 | Too many PWC to count!
Comment
-
Comment