I think its called NXS or something. Prices starting at $45,000-$50k I think its a gamble for MC. I hope Nautique doesn't go with a budget line.
X
-
Tags: None
-
There are quite a few people who would welcome the 196 hull brought back as a budget line boat.
MC has had some previous success with their entry lines, so I don't see it as much of a gamble. I sold a load of Sportstars to people who didn't want to pay the Prostar premium back in the day. The SS was actually a much better ski boat than the '98-'00 death star hull.'08 196LE (previous)
'07 196LE (previous)
2 - '06 196SE's (previous)
Comment
-
they would do well with a no frills 205V with only PP & Ballast...
great hulls - I had 2 of them. Indmar in it, not so much. But they're no longer running indmar, so could be interesting.Migs
G21 - En route
SAN 210 TE (Finally)
06 Sky Supreme V220(previous)
05 Sanger V210(previous)
01 MC X1(previous)
99 Air Warrior(previous)
Comment
-
Isn't that why the Axis line is from Malibu? Yes, the prices of new boats have gone sky high....we are getting to a pony where it seems like nautique could have a individualized custom series. I'm sure there's a market for people that would
Pay even more. If Nautique went to an entry level boat I think it would go against their whole brand. Yes, Nautique is top of the line and the best inboard ski boat made. There's no budget line ferrari!
Comment
-
Originally posted by AirTool View PostI know it will sell some boats.....Q is will it raise their overall profit .....or reduce it?2005 Ski Nautique 206 SE, Acme 422, PP SG 8.0, ND Tower
2011 strada with strada bindings
Prior Boats:
1986 Sunbird skier with 150 Evinrude VRO
1992 Mastercraft prostar 190, with Powerslot
1999 Ski Nautique GT-40
1999 Sport Nautique, GT-40 FCT,
www.skiersofknoxville.org
Comment
-
I think there are quite a few people left on the table that would be thrilled to pay 50-60k for the Nautique name. The thing I think that would come good of Nautique building a budget wake boat would be gaining a customer for life. The 29 year old guy that can afford 60k for his family boat can't afford 120k. But when that 29 year old guy is 40 he may well be able to afford a 120k boat. So what does that guy do? He wants a new boat but can't afford what Nautique has to offer. He goes out and buys an axis or a Mastercraft. Say he has a great experience with his dealer and his boat for 11 years. What would anyone else do? Buy another boat from the same dealer because the boat he owned was great and so was the dealer. That's my 2 cents. Maybe I am wrong but it seems pretty logical. Now, a budget ski boat I don't think would sell. That portion of the market is so small and growing smaller I don't think that would do a darn thing for anyone.[EMAIL="Zach@n3boatworks.com"]Zach@n3boatworks.com[/EMAIL]
Comment
-
Isn't that what the used boat market is for? You can get a 5 year old Nautique 210 that is essentially the same boat as a 2013 210 for about that $50k price point. The only difference is a few hours and a few frills. The hull and drivetrain is essentially the same.Current: 2017 G23
Previous: 2012 210 TE (former PN boat), 2005 210 TE, 2001 X-Star
Comment
-
Originally posted by OKWAKEBDR View PostIsn't that what the used boat market is for? You can get a 5 year old Nautique 210 that is essentially the same boat as a 2013 210 for about that $50k price point. The only difference is a few hours and a few frills. The hull and drivetrain is essentially the same.
Comment
-
These are age old questions. How to capture more of the market and increase profitability without diluting the brand. And you don't want people that would buy the higher end product to migrate toward the lower end, and potentially lower profitability product.
It is interesting to me, and I did not know that, malibu owns axis boats. You probably already knew that. They don't hide it or anything. But the sister company is another way that an company can try to capture a market and keep strong differentiation. In words, rather then going from a 210 to g21. You go from one company (axis) to another (malibu).
http://www.axiswake.com/axis-dna/axi...y/company.html
One of many problems is that many won't buy a boat unless they the wake is great. And if the wake is great in a lower end boat, then many are ok with not spending a premium. And after the wake there is not all that much to differentiate the product. All the engines are made by 2 or 3 companies. (all of which are good). And everyone has a surf gate of some sort.
Good fun. Let the market and freedom reign, while I continue to save for a g21. (and ponder if i can put it on my 5000lb capacity lift). wife will kill me if i have to get a 4th lift.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OKWAKEBDR View PostIsn't that what the used boat market is for? You can get a 5 year old Nautique 210 that is essentially the same boat as a 2013 210 for about that $50k price point. The only difference is a few hours and a few frills. The hull and drivetrain is essentially the same.Last edited by TxNautique210; 01-31-2014, 12:00 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TxNautique210 View PostI agree 100% and any time you buy anything new you are losing money the second you hitch it your truck and head home. A base/cheap line of Nautiques would would not only hurt there new boat prices it would also hurt all current owners and the over all resale that Nautiques have. If someone wants a base nautique buy one of the signature editions but if you take away from the quality of a Nautique to make it cheaper why not just call it a mastercraft or a malibu you get what you pay for with correct craft your paying for the best.1997 Super Sport
Comment
Comment