Questions on barefoot vs other CC's in rough water

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dockdoc
    • Feb 2014
    • 21

    • Charlotte, NC


    #1

    Questions on barefoot vs other CC's in rough water

    Looking for an inboard ski boat for a large lake which tends to get pretty rough at times. I wouldn't be out there on the big surf days, but I'd like something that can handle a little rough stuff. Budget is <$10,000, ideally in the $6-7k range.

    I've basically ruled out getting a 2001, as I've been in them on choppy days and found they get tossed around a bit.

    How do you all feel about the barefoot's for this purpose? I'm also looking at Southwinds, which are a bit more classically styled of course, but reportedly take the chop pretty well. From what I'm reading though, it sounds like the Southwind and the Barefoot have the same(ish) hull, and pound for pound I'll take the styling of a Barefoot over the Southwind any day.

    Any suggestions? Other models I should consider? Frankly, if I could find a reasonably nice Fish or Cuddy Nautique (even somewhat out of my price range) I'd probably make a move on that, although I realize that's a different category altogether.

    Appreciate the help. I've been asking on CCfan as well, just wanted to see if there were any other opinions.
  • 2001SAN
    • Apr 2012
    • 203

    • Ireland

    • 2001 Super Air Nautique 210, 1989 Fairline Corniche 31

    #2
    Not sure you're going to find a ski boat of that vintage that will handle chop well. freeboard is too low. I nearly submarined my 2001 SAN going over a loaded mastercaft wake with 2 people in the front. Just my opinion!

    D.

    Comment

    • Laptom
      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
      • Oct 2003
      • 876

      • Eindhoven, Netherlands


      #3
      Rough water drive is much better on the Barefoot (deeper V hull). It is quite noticable. Still don't like the low freeboard of the Barefoot on a rough water day...
      230 with ZR6 running on propane

      Comment

      • TRBenj
        1,000 Post Club Member
        • May 2005
        • 1681

        • NWCT


        #4
        You'll get better info from CCFan regarding boats that are 25+ years old.

        The BFN was born of the SW, the hull is the same. The SW has more freeboard and will keep you dryer (more bow flare) on a rough day. The difference between a flat bottomed 2001 and v-hulled boat like the BFN in bigger water is night and day.
        1990 Ski Nautique
        NWCT

        Comment

        • scott resick
          Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
          • Jan 2012
          • 532

          • Pittsburgh

          • 2006 196 Limited

          #5
          Ive been in these on the river a few times when pretty rough. Bigger boat, shes pretty sturdy, and well within your budget. This is a cheaper one, just attached for the pic.
          http://www.onlyinboards.com/Details.aspx?ID=30412

          Comment

          Working...
          X