2000 SAN Weight, Length, and Speed

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ayost
    • Sep 2014
    • 1

    • Raleigh NC

    • 2000 210

    #1

    2000 SAN Weight, Length, and Speed

    I have recently purchased a 2000 210 and it has the stock tanks in the back and a tube in the locker. I will however probably remove them and put 750s in. In my previous boat, a 2002 x star, I ran 500ish in each rear locker, 375 in the ski locker, and 650ish in the bow. I really liked that wake at about 21.6-22 and about 65-70 feet. I searched but couldn't find a thread talking about peoples' favorite setups. So, in short, what are yall's setups in your 210s.
  • swatguy
    1,000 Post Club Member
    • May 2008
    • 1631

    • Midwest/ Northern IL

    • 2008 SANTE 210

    #2
    You're gonna find you don't need nearly as much weight to get a similar wake. I had a 2000 XStar that logged over 1200 hours. Ran it with 750's in rear , locker sac, 800 in the nose at 24.5mph and 80ft.

    My advice on the 2000 SAN start with the factory and about an extra 400 in the nose. 22mph and add 5ft to your rope length so 70ft. The wake on the SAN will be much narrower so the additional 5ft is needed. If that doesn't satisfy you start adding a bit more to each compartment in 100lb increments because a little bit goes a long way on this hull where on the Xstar you needed bit a more to pump it up. Unless you plan on surfing, 750's are way overkill on the SAN. That is unless you're looking to win the pro tour. But if you run em you will need at least 1k in the bow. The SAN really likes bow weight were. I had my Xstar little rear heavy to get it set nice and peaky.
    Last edited by swatguy; 10-21-2014, 04:31 PM.

    Comment

    • seth
      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
      • Jun 2008
      • 549

      • Santa Barbara, CA

      • 01 SAN-sold

      #3
      750's in rear lockers, ~900 in ski locker (I had a custom bag made that fills the entire ski locker), bow sac under seat ~300, 160lbs lead under front seat, 400 against rear seat, 400 in bow. Riding 80ft at ~23.5.

      Comment

      • kend
        • Oct 2013
        • 193

        • DFW, Texas

        • current 2001 Air Nautique previous 1988 Sanger DX

        #4
        Originally posted by seth View Post
        750's in rear lockers, ~900 in ski locker (I had a custom bag made that fills the entire ski locker), bow sac under seat ~300, 160lbs lead under front seat, 400 against rear seat, 400 in bow. Riding 80ft at ~23.5.
        dude...you have almost twice the weight limit just in ballast. Like that scene from Jaws says, you're gonna need a bigger boat.
        Ken
        2001 DD Air GT40

        Comment

        • seth
          Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
          • Jun 2008
          • 549

          • Santa Barbara, CA

          • 01 SAN-sold

          #5
          I don't count water weight towards the total weight limit, because if it does sink then that water weight will no longer be a factor.

          Comment

          • kend
            • Oct 2013
            • 193

            • DFW, Texas

            • current 2001 Air Nautique previous 1988 Sanger DX

            #6
            Originally posted by seth View Post
            if it does sink then that water weight will no longer be a factor.
            now that is optimistic, the glass is half full so to speak.
            Ken
            2001 DD Air GT40

            Comment

            • swatguy
              1,000 Post Club Member
              • May 2008
              • 1631

              • Midwest/ Northern IL

              • 2008 SANTE 210

              #7
              Originally posted by seth View Post
              750's in rear lockers, ~900 in ski locker (I had a custom bag made that fills the entire ski locker), bow sac under seat ~300, 160lbs lead under front seat, 400 against rear seat, 400 in bow. Riding 80ft at ~23.5.
              Well seems like you enjoy what you got. Don't take this the wrong way as I am not hating ,but that is an absurd amount of weight that maybe .000000000001% of anyone needs


              I get the water weight idea and I personally don't count water weight against my placard, but throw that water filled sac over and it doesn't float on top of the water it floats below it
              Last edited by swatguy; 10-22-2014, 05:46 PM.

              Comment

              • seth
                Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                • Jun 2008
                • 549

                • Santa Barbara, CA

                • 01 SAN-sold

                #8
                Originally posted by kend View Post
                now that is optimistic, the glass is half full so to speak.
                Exactly! And then if you throw some lead in the glass it overflows!! That was meant more as a joke but I forgot to put a little yellow smiley face at the end of it and I still have yet to find a way to convey my dashingly good humor over the internets.

                Comment

                • seth
                  Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 549

                  • Santa Barbara, CA

                  • 01 SAN-sold

                  #9
                  Originally posted by swatguy View Post
                  Well seems like you enjoy what you got. Don't take this the wrong way as I am not hating ,but that is an absurd amount of weight that maybe .000000000001% of anyone needs


                  I get the water weight idea and I personally don't count water weight against my placard, but throw that water filled sac over and it doesn't float on top of the water it floats below it
                  No worries, ive never taken anything the wrong way. We dont always run the extra 400's. If those arent there then all the weight is hidden in that little boat. I like doing big grabbed spins and the big wake makes it easier and more fun. I also still take sets with no weight in the boat to work on fundamentals and switch tricks.

                  I bet my wake is still smaller than a stock ballast G23.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X