Inboard Biography
Ok here goes, I learned to ski on a Boston Whaler at the age of 8. Our family had 3 outboards the last of which was a 1985 Glastron Carlson CVX-16 with a 115hp evinrude. The wake was small but the 750 pound boat felt like a small dog on a leash while pulling a slalom skier.
In addition to skiing on the glastron I occasionally skied on a friend's early 70's 16 foot Century Straight Inboard (had to power up coming off plane or had serious water coming over the bow). In 1986 he upgraded to a new Supra Comp. The same year I was selling boats at a small lake Marina and we traded with another CC dealer when we had interested customers. This was my 1st dealings with a Nautique. I even did a major boat presentation in a College Marketing Class on the 1986 CC line. I campared inboards with I/O's (we used to say I/O stood for I owe the bank lots of money and still can't ski), and outboards.
Anyway the 1986 Supra Comp was impressive powerwise, the interior was awesome for it's time and had a very quality build. He still owns in now but wants to trade it for a Mallibu.
I was never that impressed with the wake and the ride was terrible in any chop at all. While sitting in the observer's seat we would lean forward crossing wakes. In fact when I'm not driving today (not often) I still lean forward in my 1996 CC out of habit to avoid the back punishment that the Comp used to provide. It's just out of habit as you can't feel them in the CC.
Working at the Marina I had a chance to drive and see every type of Inboard imaginable but always wanted a CC.
In 1996 we made the move trading the old Glastron (I ripped three Casad ski pylons out of the softening floor during the last 2 years) for a closed Bow SN. My Dad (who paid 1/2 but doesn't use it) and I narrowed it down between a Mastercraft and CC. We didn't like the seats on the MC. They seemed low and uncomfortable for whatever reason. I still remember my Supra friend asking me if I considered the Supra before buying the CC. It was 10 years after he got his Comp and they still hadn't redesigned the hull.
I expected improvement over the Supra but the 96 CC far exceeded my expectations with regards to wake, quietness, room and lack of spine damaging rough water (relative on a small lake) characteristics.
It has been 10 seasons, we have added 3 kids and a (Portuguese Water) dog. As much as we still love the 1996, we traded it for a currently being built 206 limited. We chose it over the RLXI for 2 reasons. The seats in the 206, especially driver's, are far more comfy and functional. The 2nd reason is that in 10 years we'll have 3 kids in or close to College age and I believe this boat will last and cost less to maintain than the Malibu beyond those financially strained years.
The 96 was/is flawless and could have satisfied us for many years to come. We replaced the steering cable and re-upolstered the seat cushions but the GT-40 runs as great as when we got it. Hopefully the Excalibur treats us as well.
We won't take delivery of the 206 until late May or early June.
Ok here goes, I learned to ski on a Boston Whaler at the age of 8. Our family had 3 outboards the last of which was a 1985 Glastron Carlson CVX-16 with a 115hp evinrude. The wake was small but the 750 pound boat felt like a small dog on a leash while pulling a slalom skier.
In addition to skiing on the glastron I occasionally skied on a friend's early 70's 16 foot Century Straight Inboard (had to power up coming off plane or had serious water coming over the bow). In 1986 he upgraded to a new Supra Comp. The same year I was selling boats at a small lake Marina and we traded with another CC dealer when we had interested customers. This was my 1st dealings with a Nautique. I even did a major boat presentation in a College Marketing Class on the 1986 CC line. I campared inboards with I/O's (we used to say I/O stood for I owe the bank lots of money and still can't ski), and outboards.
Anyway the 1986 Supra Comp was impressive powerwise, the interior was awesome for it's time and had a very quality build. He still owns in now but wants to trade it for a Mallibu.
I was never that impressed with the wake and the ride was terrible in any chop at all. While sitting in the observer's seat we would lean forward crossing wakes. In fact when I'm not driving today (not often) I still lean forward in my 1996 CC out of habit to avoid the back punishment that the Comp used to provide. It's just out of habit as you can't feel them in the CC.
Working at the Marina I had a chance to drive and see every type of Inboard imaginable but always wanted a CC.
In 1996 we made the move trading the old Glastron (I ripped three Casad ski pylons out of the softening floor during the last 2 years) for a closed Bow SN. My Dad (who paid 1/2 but doesn't use it) and I narrowed it down between a Mastercraft and CC. We didn't like the seats on the MC. They seemed low and uncomfortable for whatever reason. I still remember my Supra friend asking me if I considered the Supra before buying the CC. It was 10 years after he got his Comp and they still hadn't redesigned the hull.
I expected improvement over the Supra but the 96 CC far exceeded my expectations with regards to wake, quietness, room and lack of spine damaging rough water (relative on a small lake) characteristics.
It has been 10 seasons, we have added 3 kids and a (Portuguese Water) dog. As much as we still love the 1996, we traded it for a currently being built 206 limited. We chose it over the RLXI for 2 reasons. The seats in the 206, especially driver's, are far more comfy and functional. The 2nd reason is that in 10 years we'll have 3 kids in or close to College age and I believe this boat will last and cost less to maintain than the Malibu beyond those financially strained years.
The 96 was/is flawless and could have satisfied us for many years to come. We replaced the steering cable and re-upolstered the seat cushions but the GT-40 runs as great as when we got it. Hopefully the Excalibur treats us as well.
We won't take delivery of the 206 until late May or early June.
Comment