Congratulations to Correct Craft in winning the 2006 J.D. Power Award in Customer Satisfaction! Press release date 02/16/06 in Westlake Village California.
X
-
RE: 2006 J.D. Power Release
The press release is also on our front page.I own and operate Silver Cove Marine, which is an inboard boat restoration, service, and sales facility located in Mooresville, North Carolina. We specializes in Nautiques and Correct Crafts, and also provide general service for Nautiques fifteen years old and older.
If we can be of service to you, please contact us anytime!
Current Boats —> 2025 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2001 Ski Nautique -- 2000 Nautique Super Sport PYTHON -- 2000 Nautique Super Sport -- 1999 Ski Nautique PYTHON-- 1985 Sea Nautique 2700 (Twin-Engine, 1 of 13) -- 1981 Fish Nautique (Twin-Engine, 1 of 4) -- 1980 Fish Nautique (Twin-Engine, 1 of 4)
Former Boats —> 2024 Super Air Nautique G23 PARAGON -- 2023 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2022 Super Air Nautique G23 PARAGON -- 2021 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2021 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2020 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2019 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2018 Super Air Nautique G23-- 2018 SAN 210 TE -- 2017 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2016 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2015 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2014 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2014 Super Air Nautique 230 Team Edition — 2013 Super Air Nautique G23 — 2012 Super Air Nautique 210 Team Edition — 2011 Super Air Nautique 210 Team Edition — 2010 Super Air Nautique 210 Team Edition — 2008 Super Air Nautique 230 Team Edition — 2007 Air Nautique 236 Team Edition -- 2007 Air Nautique SV-211 -- 2005 SV-211 -- 2003 Super Air Nautique 210 Team Edition -- 2003 Air Nautique 226 -- 2003 Sport Nautique 216 -- 2003 Ski Nautique 196 -- 2003 Ski Nautique 196-- 2002 Ski Nautique -- 2001 Sport Nautique -- 2001 Ski Nautique -- 2000 Sport Nautique -- 1999 Ski Nautique Open Bow -- 1999 Air Tique 176 -- 1998 Ski Nautique -- 1998 Ski Nautique -- 1998 Ski Nautique -- 1997 Ski Nautique -- 1997 Ski Nautique -- 1996 Ski Nautique Open Bow -- 1994 Ski Nautique -- 1993 Barefoot Nautique -- 1983 Fish Nautique (TWIN ENGINE, 1 of 4) -- 1981 Fish Nautique (SINGLE ENGINE)
Need something for your boat? Please check out our site sponsors! Not only do they offer the best products available, they also support this site.
Silver Cove Marine - NautiqueParts.com - Phoenix Trailers - SkiSafe - PCM Marine Engines - C&S Marine - OJ Propellers
-
Mastercraft Up, Malibu Down
http://consumercenter.jdpower.com/cc...index.asp?v1=6
Very Interesting Results
Comment
-
Yeah I think they were... I dunno what spurred this big change... Maybe MC's new boats this year, the X2 and X15 stole some of the BU market... just a guess...[color=blue][size=2][b]I Nautique, therefore I am.[/b][/size][/color]
Comment
-
I'm really surprised at how Malibu did. Weren't they neck and neck with CC last year?
I'm looking forward to Edwin's take on this!
Comment
-
I have a couple thoughts on the results. CC has to be building a good product with a good dealer network to get the award 4 yrs running...this didn't happen by accident, hence congrats are in order.
That said, the survey business is not a perfect one. I spent almost 8 years in the auto industry and was fortunate enough to work at an Acura store in the early 90's when Acura was #1 according to JD Power, and we were the #1 Acura store among it's dealers. On the surface it's a big deal. When you looked into the number of new Acura cars being put on the road vs everyone else, it's kind of unfair to grade them the same as we sold 30 new cars a month. An equivalent BMW, MB, Cadillac, etc dealer in the area sold 3x the cars. When the dealer has the abilty to spend 2x the time on each car due to lower volume, there's no reason they shouldn't be the best. CC is similar in this situation as the sales volume vs Malibu and MC aren't even close.
Another factor here is the price paid by customers. Statistical surveys will show you that people who pay a premium for goods have a higher perceived level of satisfaction. Hence, their scores will be higher on a survey. Similar to people who buy high end luxury autos. Add to that the loyal group of owners who are less likely to say anything bad about their beloved product.
The cust sat awards are important, but the most important thing for CC is to ensure they're making the products their targeted market will plop down cash and purchase. All of the big 3 are prone to making a lemon here and there ( check out http://www.planetnautique.com/index....er=asc&start=0 if you think CC is exempt). Fact is CC has provided the product and associated support to get the award...kudos to them.
Think of how much larger the 206 market would be if they could only figure out how to put an adult sized ski in the locker...
Comment
-
Boat - 2005 Team 226 -ZR6 - Several Acme Prop's (1234, 644, 1160) Depending on occassion
Tow Rig - 2008 Chevy Silverado - Duramax Diesel - Crew Cab
Comment
-
Originally posted by EdwinI have a couple thoughts on the results. CC has to be building a good product with a good dealer network to get the award 4 yrs running...this didn't happen by accident, hence congrats are in order.
That said, the survey business is not a perfect one. I spent almost 8 years in the auto industry and was fortunate enough to work at an Acura store in the early 90's when Acura was #1 according to JD Power, and we were the #1 Acura store among it's dealers. On the surface it's a big deal. When you looked into the number of new Acura cars being put on the road vs everyone else, it's kind of unfair to grade them the same as we sold 30 new cars a month. An equivalent BMW, MB, Cadillac, etc dealer in the area sold 3x the cars. When the dealer has the abilty to spend 2x the time on each car due to lower volume, there's no reason they shouldn't be the best. CC is similar in this situation as the sales volume vs Malibu and MC aren't even close.
Another factor here is the price paid by customers. Statistical surveys will show you that people who pay a premium for goods have a higher perceived level of satisfaction. Hence, their scores will be higher on a survey. Similar to people who buy high end luxury autos. Add to that the loyal group of owners who are less likely to say anything bad about their beloved product.
The cust sat awards are important, but the most important thing for CC is to ensure they're making the products their targeted market will plop down cash and purchase. All of the big 3 are prone to making a lemon here and there ( check out http://www.planetnautique.com/index....er=asc&start=0 if you think CC is exempt). Fact is CC has provided the product and associated support to get the award...kudos to them.
Think of how much larger the 206 market would be if they could only figure out how to put an adult sized ski in the locker...
Edwin
Great points as I expected. Ironically I worked at an Acura store is the late 80's, my wife still wishes we had her 87 Intergra (as I digress)
Trunk size aside CC's ratings didn't suprise me rather MC overtaking Malibu for number 2. Does your same theory hold true?
Comment
-
I'd say MC is somewhat in the same position as CC. They have similar build practices as CC - installing components with a machine screw, flat washer, and lock nut in areas where Malibu might just zip in a sheet metal screw. MC's followers are similar to CC in that there's a long history, sense of ownership pride, and the price tag to go with it. Malibu prides itself on price / performance / value. Buyers that value those attributes normally aren't swayed by construction methods and the other "feel good" benefits.
I can't speak for for the 'bu HQ, but my guess would be that 'bu looks at the business differently than the other two. What does Malibu have to gain by stepping up the level enough to win a JD Powers award? They already can't build enough boats to satisfy demand. Again, just my take on it but Malibu's probably feels that CC can win that battle as 'bu is winning the war.
Comment
-
Could it be as basic as a higher percentage of Correct Craft owners are pleased with their boat and took the time to respond?
Comment
Comment