It was actually a V6 diesel, but I agree the power was lacking for the added price.
X
-
-
Originally posted by Wayward View Post
That’s right, it was a 6. It’s been a while.....
I could be remembering wrong, but I think it was only about 220hp, and 300lb/ft of torque, right?'08 196LE (previous)
'07 196LE (previous)
2 - '06 196SE's (previous)
Comment
-
i personally think i6 Turbo diesel would be the best for boats. V6 isn't as long, and idk if Yanmar even makes inline 6s. but if goes 6 cylinder, inline is the best configuration IMO, one hot manifold, other side is all cold intake.
diesel exhaust with a surf pipe would be pretty negligible while surfing. might soot up the swim platform, sides or back of the boat though.
Comment
-
I had it in my mind it was even more than 20K upgrade in price (?closer to 30K?), but it did seem pretty great at the time. It never took off, probably due to some of the reasons noted above.
Nowadays, surf boats are pushing so much more ballast than back then that it seems reasonable to give it another shot. The advantage to a diesel motor seems even greater now that these boats have continued to become more tractor and less sports car.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nyryan2001 View Posthttps://www.yanmarmarine.com/Product...s/8LV-350-386/
~350hp and ~800ft/lb tq.
peak Tq comes in low at 2500rpm... burning under 6gph2019 SAN G23 | 2016 SAN G23 | 2013 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2008 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2003 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2000 Wakesetter VLX | 1998 Sanger V210 | 1994 Magic Sceptor 28 | 1985 Cole TR2 | Too many PWC to count!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tallredrider View PostI had it in my mind it was even more than 20K upgrade in price (?closer to 30K?).Last edited by swc5150; 10-29-2018, 04:27 PM.'08 196LE (previous)
'07 196LE (previous)
2 - '06 196SE's (previous)
Comment
-
You could run “”off-road”” diesel in it and not have to pay road construction taxes on the fuel! That would be great.2007 Malibu Wakesetter 23 LSV, 1995 Cobalt 200
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evening Shade View PostYou could run “”off-road”” diesel in it and not have to pay road construction taxes on the fuel! That would be great.
Comment
-
In California, it would be impossible to find diesel on fresh water.2019 SAN G23 | 2016 SAN G23 | 2013 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2008 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2003 Wakesetter 23 LSV | 2000 Wakesetter VLX | 1998 Sanger V210 | 1994 Magic Sceptor 28 | 1985 Cole TR2 | Too many PWC to count!
Comment
-
I’m guessing this would be much more attractive for non-north American exports where gas is much more expensive and diesel much more prevalent.
Sent from my iPad using PLT Nautique2011 SANTE 210 ZR409 (6.0L)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GMLIII View Post
Yep and in most fresh water lakes in North America
Pleasure boating requires no fuel tax, so you could burn the same fuel in your boat, as what you use to heat your house. Throw in a fuel pump, or a simple valve (if you have gravity working with you), and fill your boat up at home! Not to mention, all the money you save by not having to buy taxed fuel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by McCannLand View PostI’m guessing this would be much more attractive for non-north American exports where gas is much more expensive and diesel much more prevalent.
Sent from my iPad using PLT Nautique
Comment
Comment