Anyone have a tower on a 196?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bkhallpass
    1,000 Post Club Member
    • Apr 2005
    • 1407

    • Discovery Bay, CA

    • 2001 Super Air Nautique (Current) 1998 Ski Nautique (former) 1982 Ski Nautique (Current)

    #31
    Re: RE: Re: tower

    Originally posted by TRBenj
    Quinner, the ability to rock the boat was solely due to the narrow '80 hull. Assuming the tow points are the same height, the force from a skier would rock a boat with a tower just as much as an extended pylon- simple physics. The tower would probably spread out the force more evenly, making it a little easier on the deck/hull.
    TRBenj,

    Yes, narrow hull would rock more, but I'm not sure that I entirely agree with your
    physics. When pulling to the side on an extended pylon, the entire rotational force is focused at a single point, where the pylon mounts to the hull. This could be a in the thousands pounds with a heavy skier pulling hard on what amounts to a 6 or 7 foot lever. With the tower, I believe the tower distributes some of the load, pushing some of the force to the side of the boat opposite the skier. At that attachment point, I believe the counterforce of the boat's own weight, is at it's maximum. ICBW, it's been 25 years since I studied physics. BKH
    2001 Super Air

    Comment

    • Mikeski
      1,000 Post Club Member
      • Jul 2003
      • 2908

      • San Francisco, CA

      • Current 2005 SV 211, due for upgrade! GS22 or GS24 perhaps? Previous

      #32
      RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

      Brian/TRB,

      I remember from Dynamics that the problem is solve easily if you assume the moment arm is a rigid structure, be it tower or pole. In that case it doesn't matter if it's built with toothpicks it exerts exactly the same force on the hulls runners counter acting the force of the boarder. That said a tower will likely flex less exerting more force on the runners instantaneously causing the boat to lean more, but the difference should still be negligible. It seems the problem is easily solved if you just break it down to the applied force and opposing forces.

      M

      Comment

      • Hollywood
        1,000 Post Club Member
        • Sep 2003
        • 1930

        • WIIL


        #33
        RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

        Doesn't matter the path the force is translated, It's the same distance (lever arm) from the center of mass of the boat, both in theory would tip the same. I don't even want to go into center of bouyancy.

        Comment

        • bkhallpass
          1,000 Post Club Member
          • Apr 2005
          • 1407

          • Discovery Bay, CA

          • 2001 Super Air Nautique (Current) 1998 Ski Nautique (former) 1982 Ski Nautique (Current)

          #34
          RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

          Mike,

          I've made the same assumption when trying to calc the folce a boarder/skier might put on a tower, or extended pylon. But, that's mostly because I'm not smart enough any more to break down all those vectors, omegas, blah, blah, blah. You two are proobably right; the forces are probably the same, or close to the same. Yet, antidotally, it's always seemed to me that the boats rock over more with an extended pylon than with a tower. Maybe it's just wishful thinking. BKH
          2001 Super Air

          Comment

          • Hollywood
            1,000 Post Club Member
            • Sep 2003
            • 1930

            • WIIL


            #35
            Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

            Originally posted by bkhallpass
            Yet, antidotally, it's always seemed to me that the boats rock over more with an extended pylon than with a tower. Maybe it's just wishful thinking. BKH
            I agree, but can't figure it out. If anything the weight of the tower causing the CM to go up would make the tipping factor worse. Let's discuss this further over a couple drinks eh?

            Comment

            • ClemsonDave
              Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
              • Oct 2004
              • 659

              • Glen Allen, VA

              • Ski Nautique 200

              #36
              RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

              big words, physics, etc. Looks like the crowd is about 50/50 of me turning the best ski boat in the world into a wakeboard boat! My vote is to not do it, but for my kids, I just might. Let's see that will bring my retail price of an 07 196 to apx. $60k YIKES!!!!
              Promo Team member
              1999 196
              2003 196 Limited 2003 196 Limited
              2008 196 Limited 2008 196 Limited
              2010 200 Team 2010 200 Team
              2011 200 Team 2011 200 Team
              2012 200 Team - 2012 200 Team
              2013 200 Team - 2013 200 Team
              2014 200 Team - 2014 200 Team
              2015 200 Team - on the way

              Comment

              • bkhallpass
                1,000 Post Club Member
                • Apr 2005
                • 1407

                • Discovery Bay, CA

                • 2001 Super Air Nautique (Current) 1998 Ski Nautique (former) 1982 Ski Nautique (Current)

                #37
                Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

                Originally posted by Hollywood

                Let's discuss this further over a couple drinks eh?
                I'm in. I'll be in Skokie September 11-14. BKH
                2001 Super Air

                Comment

                • Onthewater
                  Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 695

                  • Near the cheddar curtain


                  #38
                  Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

                  Originally posted by bkhallpass

                  I'm in. I'll be in Skokie September 11-14. BKH
                  ... in a barbershop quartet?


                  Quinner, you in hibernation? Still recovering from GL? :razz:
                  I don\'t care.

                  Comment

                  • Quinner
                    1,000 Post Club Member
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 2245

                    • Unknown

                    • Correct Crafts

                    #39
                    Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

                    Originally posted by Onthewater
                    Originally posted by bkhallpass

                    I'm in. I'll be in Skokie September 11-14. BKH
                    ... in a barbershop quartet?


                    Quinner, you in hibernation? Still recovering from GL? :razz:
                    What's up OTW?

                    I am still here, heading up to Michigan this afternoon for some skiing, all is good! I am looking forward to the Mini midwest Reunion, do it all over again!

                    Dave,
                    I would disagree that a tower makes a boat a wakeboard boat, I am primarily a skier and barefooter however I like to do everything else (trick, foil, board, etc.) as time allows. I always foot from my tower and ski from the low point on my extended pylon. You may want to consider the factory extended pylon as well, if nothing else it holds up the cover well.

                    Comment

                    • bkhallpass
                      1,000 Post Club Member
                      • Apr 2005
                      • 1407

                      • Discovery Bay, CA

                      • 2001 Super Air Nautique (Current) 1998 Ski Nautique (former) 1982 Ski Nautique (Current)

                      #40
                      RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

                      OTW,

                      My company is headquartered in Skokie. I'll be in town for a three day meeting. Would be cool to get together for an adult beverage with Quinner, OTW, Hollywood, mojo, etc. BKH
                      2001 Super Air

                      Comment

                      • Onthewater
                        Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 695

                        • Near the cheddar curtain


                        #41
                        RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: tower

                        yea I know,

                        just making a reference to the movie "The Usual Suspects".

                        I am game, let me know what works for you.
                        I don\'t care.

                        Comment

                        • niagararob
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 70

                          • Niagara Falls Ontario


                          #42
                          good movie ,"Usual Suspects" . Not enough skiing scenes only people falling into water dead.

                          Comment

                          • bkhallpass
                            1,000 Post Club Member
                            • Apr 2005
                            • 1407

                            • Discovery Bay, CA

                            • 2001 Super Air Nautique (Current) 1998 Ski Nautique (former) 1982 Ski Nautique (Current)

                            #43
                            I'll have to rent it. BKH
                            2001 Super Air

                            Comment

                            • cat1168
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 73

                              • Connecticut


                              #44
                              2005 196 with the flight control tower

                              Comment

                              • ClemsonDave
                                Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                                • Oct 2004
                                • 659

                                • Glen Allen, VA

                                • Ski Nautique 200

                                #45
                                Thanks cat for the pics. Looks pretty good for me. Man I hope I dont get sucked into the darkside.
                                Promo Team member
                                1999 196
                                2003 196 Limited 2003 196 Limited
                                2008 196 Limited 2008 196 Limited
                                2010 200 Team 2010 200 Team
                                2011 200 Team 2011 200 Team
                                2012 200 Team - 2012 200 Team
                                2013 200 Team - 2013 200 Team
                                2014 200 Team - 2014 200 Team
                                2015 200 Team - on the way

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X