It’s all a matter of perspective. I’m ok but it’s the people who are more disruptive than me who are the problem, right? We all like a calm, wind-protected shoreline. Whether it’s for water sports, fishing, kayaking, building a dock on, it’s just the prime water. It’s a shared resource. None of us own it. The other day I felt like I was giving a fisherman plenty of room as we were surfing. He came over and asked if we could move out a little. That’s fine. If I see someone trying to ski I’ll gladly give them the shore and move out a little. I’ve had surfers move out other when I was wakeboarding before. I stay away from kayakers. All it takes is being a little more understanding of what Is going on around us.
X
-
Originally posted by Nautiquehunter View PostI live on Lake Lanier Georgia with 700 miles of shoreline you would think there would be room for all . The issue I see is the as the wakes get bigger the brain gets smaller. Remember when we complained about the Wallys pulling tubes and pwc's tearing it up? Now its the surf ships weighing in at 10k plus and heading straight to the ski coves because everybody knows you need glass to surf. I bought a 210 in 08 to surf its now the least used boat I own . Surfing is fine 5-10 % of the time when the water gets churned up or out in the main channel. I find it boring and driving multiple surfers is awful for the driver . Buying a one trick pony for 200k is insane to me . This fad will fade like wakeboarding or it will be banned because of reckless owners and the damage they cause to docks,shoreline and other boats.
Btw, I don’t think wakeboarding is or will be fading, some have just added surfing to their mix. Skiing on the other hand...
Comment
-
-
As much as I hate to admit it the solution may be to impose length limits that rule out boats designed to throw massive waves, at least on smaller bodies of water. That also would solve wake issues from massive boats just trolling about, blissfully unaware they're sending giant rollers everywhere. Banning wake enhancement devices seems largely unenforceable nor does that help from other huge rigs that just throw big wakes at slow speeds.
And of course, a length limit as such would definitely rain on our 21' parade.'08 Super Air Nautique 210
Comment
-
-
Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
- Apr 2019
- 691
- Columbus, OH
- 2005 Super Air 210 Team; 1960 Chris Craft 18' Continental
Originally posted by jhiestand View PostAs much as I hate to admit it the solution may be to impose length limits that rule out boats designed to throw massive waves, at least on smaller bodies of water. That also would solve wake issues from massive boats just trolling about, blissfully unaware they're sending giant rollers everywhere. Banning wake enhancement devices seems largely unenforceable nor does that help from other huge rigs that just throw big wakes at slow speeds.
And of course, a length limit as such would definitely rain on our 21' parade.
Comment
-
What about the large yachts blissfully plowing large rollers around the lake and shoreline. Same thing. Either way it is up to the captain to pay attention to the effects of his boat and its wake.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Ian S
2014 SANTE. NSS. Pro balllast. Boatmate trailer
2004 SANTE. 4000 lb ballast, 2013 graphics (prev). Ramlin trailer
2009 Moomba Outback (prev). Boatmate trailer
Comment
-
-
The large yachts don't make repeated passes over and over and over the same places again. Or if they do, it seems to be rare. On Possum Kingdom they go to ****'s Gate, drop anchor, and sit and RTB later in the day or weekend. But I do agree that the (C)aptain (capitalized for emphasis) is responsible for their vessel and that isn't well regarded around lakes.
Someone commented about wind vs a surf boat here. Wind driven waves on a lake have far less energy than wake from surf boats - and I think this is really the crux of the issue: wave energy or power. Wind wave has, obviously, much higher frequency but much lower magnitude and thus less energy. To match what I see your average G put out in terms of wave height and propagation would require hours and hours of 50-60mph winds on our lake. We get both out here in West Texas. I'd have to dig really deep to the one semester of ship's engineering, but the displacement of the water with a surf barge vs wind I believe is because the area is exponential in the power equation. In other words, the more you present a sunken surface area of your boat, there is an EXPONENTIAL, not linear increase in wave power.
I'll be honest that while I knew surf boats too close to docks were bad, I had never really experienced it myself. My wife and I were floating off of our dock last month and I look down the shore only to see our brand new neighbors with their brand new Mastercraft X22. They were surfing less than 50' off of the docks. I start waving for them to move out further and the mom driving just blissfully waves back. As they get closer I see the docks they had passed rocking like absolute crazy so I start waving and yelling even more. By now, her son who is riding the wave sees what is happening and starts yelling to his mom who is still in la la land. The wave that hit us was above my head floating on an inflatable raft and pushed my wife into our dock and nearly knocked our dog off the dock as well. Not one word of apology, but they went about as far away from the shore as you could after that. Of course this is the same crew that does power turns after every rider falls and they, despite their $2M+ house and their nice MC, went super cheap on the dock and it is practically sunk with their heavy boat on it. Come to think of it, it wouldn't surprise me if they never emptied the ballast when they put it on the lift.
My overall impression is that we're probably all preaching to the choir here. If you are self aware enough about boating to have a nice Nautique, log onto a forum, do some reading, and build your knowledge base... you probably aren't the problem.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mooneywa View PostThe large yachts don't make repeated passes over and over and over the same places again. Or if they do, it seems to be rare. On Possum Kingdom they go to ****'s Gate, drop anchor, and sit and RTB later in the day or weekend. But I do agree that the (C)aptain (capitalized for emphasis) is responsible for their vessel and that isn't well regarded around lakes.
Someone commented about wind vs a surf boat here. Wind driven waves on a lake have far less energy than wake from surf boats - and I think this is really the crux of the issue: wave energy or power. Wind wave has, obviously, much higher frequency but much lower magnitude and thus less energy. To match what I see your average G put out in terms of wave height and propagation would require hours and hours of 50-60mph winds on our lake. We get both out here in West Texas. I'd have to dig really deep to the one semester of ship's engineering, but the displacement of the water with a surf barge vs wind I believe is because the area is exponential in the power equation. In other words, the more you present a sunken surface area of your boat, there is an EXPONENTIAL, not linear increase in wave power.
I'll be honest that while I knew surf boats too close to docks were bad, I had never really experienced it myself. My wife and I were floating off of our dock last month and I look down the shore only to see our brand new neighbors with their brand new Mastercraft X22. They were surfing less than 50' off of the docks. I start waving for them to move out further and the mom driving just blissfully waves back. As they get closer I see the docks they had passed rocking like absolute crazy so I start waving and yelling even more. By now, her son who is riding the wave sees what is happening and starts yelling to his mom who is still in la la land. The wave that hit us was above my head floating on an inflatable raft and pushed my wife into our dock and nearly knocked our dog off the dock as well. Not one word of apology, but they went about as far away from the shore as you could after that. Of course this is the same crew that does power turns after every rider falls and they, despite their $2M+ house and their nice MC, went super cheap on the dock and it is practically sunk with their heavy boat on it. Come to think of it, it wouldn't surprise me if they never emptied the ballast when they put it on the lift.
My overall impression is that we're probably all preaching to the choir here. If you are self aware enough about boating to have a nice Nautique, log onto a forum, do some reading, and build your knowledge base... you probably aren't the problem.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jhiestand View PostAs much as I hate to admit it the solution may be to impose length limits that rule out boats designed to throw massive waves, at least on smaller bodies of water. That also would solve wake issues from massive boats just trolling about, blissfully unaware they're sending giant rollers everywhere. Banning wake enhancement devices seems largely unenforceable nor does that help from other huge rigs that just throw big wakes at slow speeds.
And of course, a length limit as such would definitely rain on our 21' parade.
Comment
-
-
-
Realistically all we have to do is teach people how to drive like *******s. I get very pissed when I see people who should not have a giant boat because they don’t know how to handle it driving all over the place or driving in circles and sending rollers all over the lake.
Comment
-
-
1,000 Post Club Member
- May 2013
- 2792
- Smith Mountain Lake, VA (Craddock Creek area)
- 2017 G23 Coastal Edition H6 | 2001 Sport Nautique | 1981 Ski Nautique
Originally posted by Brien View PostRealistically all we have to do is teach people how to drive like *******s. I get very pissed when I see people who should not have a giant boat because they donât know how to handle it driving all over the place or driving in circles and sending rollers all over the lake.
Comment
Comment