Hot In News - No Wakesurf Zone denied on Smith Mountain Lake, VA

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GMLIII
    1,000 Post Club Member
    • May 2013
    • 2792

    • Smith Mountain Lake, VA (Craddock Creek area)

    • 2017 G23 Coastal Edition H6 | 2001 Sport Nautique | 1981 Ski Nautique

    Hot In News - No Wakesurf Zone denied on Smith Mountain Lake, VA

    Great news for Smith Mountain Lake, VA

    No-wakesurfing zone denied by DWR (smithmountainlake.com)
  • Gtsum2
    • Jul 2019
    • 224

    • Virginia

    • 2020 G23

    #2
    That is great news...glad to see some common sense prevail (instead of singling out wakesurfing, if it that bad in that area, make it a no wake zone for all boats).

    Comment

    • Badfoot
      • Sep 2022
      • 24

      • Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia

      • 2019 G23

      #3
      That is good news! Thanks for posting the article.

      Comment

      • GMLIII
        1,000 Post Club Member
        • May 2013
        • 2792

        • Smith Mountain Lake, VA (Craddock Creek area)

        • 2017 G23 Coastal Edition H6 | 2001 Sport Nautique | 1981 Ski Nautique

        #4
        Gtsum2 Since I posted this article link, The DWR (Department of Wildlife Resources in Virginia) made a post response after they denied the No Wakesurf Zone request. As you suggested, the DWR told the Buoys LLC (the group formed which submitted the No Wakesurf Zone application) to submit a request for a NO WAKE ZONE and they will review it. We will see where this goes or how it develops.

        Comment

        • SilentSeven
          1,000 Post Club Member
          • Feb 2014
          • 1843

          • Bellevue WA

          • 2004 Nautique 206

          #5
          Scanned the article...looks to me like the proposal was more rejected on technical issues (buoy marking, selective application, etc) than on the merits of wake damage. I found this section interesting

          ...motorboats including those designed or modified to create extra-large wakes, could continue to operate without deviation so long as they were not specifically engaged in wake surfing activity. Therefore, the act of wake surfing, in and of itself, does not present any challenges which are unique from a public safety perspective and are not encompassed in other related activities which would remain permitted. As such, the prohibition of wake surfing would not have a significant impact with regard to public safety
          Seems to leave the door open to target boats with wake enhancing measures. But then the DWR seems to acknowledge enforcement difficulty by setting a lower bar

          ...DWR also suggested a no-wake zone for the area instead of the no-wakesurfing zone.
          If I was one of the petitioning homeowners I would take the hint and change the request to a no-wake zone as GMLIII notes above. A no-wake zone would likely draw more public reaction and comment than the more narrow 'no-wake surf zone'. This whole cat and mouse game likely doesn't occur without wake enhanced boats....will be interesting to follow.
          2004 206 Air Nautique Limited - Black with Vapor Blue (family style)
          1997 Masters Edition Nautique - Zephyr Green - gone (amazing ski wake)
          1982 Mastercraft Powerslot - gone (a primitive but wonderful beast)
          Bellevue WA

          Comment

          • GMLIII
            1,000 Post Club Member
            • May 2013
            • 2792

            • Smith Mountain Lake, VA (Craddock Creek area)

            • 2017 G23 Coastal Edition H6 | 2001 Sport Nautique | 1981 Ski Nautique

            #6
            SilentSeven The "Hole" in this situation as it was presented is that any type of boat whether cabin cruiser, wake boat, ski boat or runabout can produce any size wake through a No Wakesurf Zone as long as there is no one wakesurfing behind the boat without any type of violation or citation. I'm not saying this is good idea but that is how the entire No Wakesurf Zone was presented to DWR by the petitioning homeowners.

            Comment

            • SilentSeven
              1,000 Post Club Member
              • Feb 2014
              • 1843

              • Bellevue WA

              • 2004 Nautique 206

              #7
              The DWR discussion highlights how challenging developing a fair and enforceable regulation will be. I wonder how well this Oregon attempt at regulation worked this summer?

              https://www.statesmanjournal.com/sto...%20rules%20say.
              2004 206 Air Nautique Limited - Black with Vapor Blue (family style)
              1997 Masters Edition Nautique - Zephyr Green - gone (amazing ski wake)
              1982 Mastercraft Powerslot - gone (a primitive but wonderful beast)
              Bellevue WA

              Comment

              • GMLIII
                1,000 Post Club Member
                • May 2013
                • 2792

                • Smith Mountain Lake, VA (Craddock Creek area)

                • 2017 G23 Coastal Edition H6 | 2001 Sport Nautique | 1981 Ski Nautique

                #8
                Follow up since TCLA was denied the first no wakesurfing zone at SML by the Department of Wildlife Resources. Maybe a model used by other states moving forward?

                https://smithmountainlake.com/news/l...LjOweceHL3DYcQ

                Comment

                Working...
                X