I have read most of this thread and have to say that I think my personal experience with the boat can back up any claims these people are making. I had the chance to ride the boat with stock ballast and 9 people (1200-1300lbs extra). The wake did not look much better than the pics posted in some of the earlier pages. I am sorry, but I believe nautique has made a huge mistake getting rid of this hull. I hope they bring it back in a few years with all the suggested corrections that the people on this site have made. Also maybe market it as a pricepoint boat.
X
-
-
I know pics dont do wakes justice... but that first one doesnt look THAT bad....
All the other pictures, i agree, look crapply... but i'm still a little confused why cc would have produced this boat then.. Its not like the wake was a surprise when they started its production. can't hide from the fact that some pros out there said, "its awesome, go for it.." otherwise even cc wouldn't have made it....
sry if this has been covered... just trying to give them one last chance before i bash them totally...[color=blue][size=2][b]I Nautique, therefore I am.[/b][/size][/color]
Comment
-
To me it is just another wake like all the rest. I don't really care, as I don't want a SAN wake, but alass, that is what I have.
I personally think they should have kept the steep wake for those that want it especially since they have so many other options for the rampy wake. 211, 236, 226, etc...
Comment
Comment