210 wake report...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • leo0648
    • Dec 2006
    • 2



    #91
    I have read most of this thread and have to say that I think my personal experience with the boat can back up any claims these people are making. I had the chance to ride the boat with stock ballast and 9 people (1200-1300lbs extra). The wake did not look much better than the pics posted in some of the earlier pages. I am sorry, but I believe nautique has made a huge mistake getting rid of this hull. I hope they bring it back in a few years with all the suggested corrections that the people on this site have made. Also maybe market it as a pricepoint boat.

    Comment

    • leo0648
      • Dec 2006
      • 2



      #92
      I forgot to mention that I own a 1983 2001 and have 3 friends who own SANTE 210's. I have ridden both boats with lots of ballast and know what these narrow hulls are capable of, which is the reason why I am so dissappointed with the 2007 210.

      Comment

      • jvuotto
        • Jan 2005
        • 60



        #93
        06 210

        Comment

        • Sinkoumn
          Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
          • Jun 2006
          • 578

          • MPLS - St. Paul, MN

          • Super Sport Nautique

          #94
          ^ heh?
          Neuston Boards
          Nautiques

          Comment

          • speck
            • Sep 2005
            • 236



            #95
            pride and joy

            Comment

            • baine157
              • Oct 2006
              • 77



              #96
              bring back the 03 hull

              Comment

              • stew
                • Jan 2006
                • 27



                #97
                210

                Here are some pics with factory ballast full , twin 350's in side storage and a 650 in the walk thru. Unfortunately we only had two people in the boat (400 lbs. ) I think we need another 1,000 lbs and 3 more people.

                Comment

                • stew
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 27



                  #98
                  another pic

                  Comment

                  • AbunDiga909
                    1,000 Post Club Member
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 2470

                    • St. Louis, MO


                    #99
                    I know pics dont do wakes justice... but that first one doesnt look THAT bad....

                    All the other pictures, i agree, look crapply... but i'm still a little confused why cc would have produced this boat then.. Its not like the wake was a surprise when they started its production. can't hide from the fact that some pros out there said, "its awesome, go for it.." otherwise even cc wouldn't have made it....

                    sry if this has been covered... just trying to give them one last chance before i bash them totally...
                    [color=blue][size=2][b]I Nautique, therefore I am.[/b][/size][/color]

                    Comment

                    • ag4ever
                      1,000 Post Club Member
                      • Feb 2004
                      • 1180



                      #100
                      To me it is just another wake like all the rest. I don't really care, as I don't want a SAN wake, but alass, that is what I have.

                      I personally think they should have kept the steep wake for those that want it especially since they have so many other options for the rampy wake. 211, 236, 226, etc...

                      Comment

                      • Laptom
                        Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 876

                        • Eindhoven, Netherlands


                        #101
                        It's really not that bad. It's seems much steeper then a X1 or VLX in my opinion. To bad it needs extra ballast.
                        230 with ZR6 running on propane

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X