Acme 1941 vs 1235

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nautiques4life
    Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
    • Jan 2009
    • 696

    • SoCal

    • 2012 SANTE 230 Previous: 2005 SANTE 210 1997 OG Air Nautique

    Acme 1941 vs 1235

    2012 SANTE 230 w/330, 1100's in rear, center, and bow 600.

    I know one is recommended for wakeboarding vs the other general boating, any of you have any experience with either. I think I currently have a 1235, but do as much if not more driving around the lake 'cause the ride spot is so far away. I'd say my engine hours are 70% motorboating and 30% riding. Interested in how each would effect RPMs, topspeed, fuel costs, and hole shot with ballast.
  • Jonny Quest
    Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
    • Aug 2014
    • 377

    • Salt Lake City, Utah via Texas

    • 2003 Ski Nautique 206 Limited with ZR6 Engine

    #2
    ACME 1941
    L/H 4-Blade 14.5X15.5 .105 cup

    ACME 1235
    L/H 4-Blade 14.5X14.25 .105 cup

    Finding the "right prop" is a little art + science. Most will agree that the correct prop will allow the engine to run at recommended maximum intermittent RPMs at W-O-T (wide open throttle). This assumes a lightly-loaded boat and no ballast. That is a good place to start and will likely be your general boating propeller. If you want a little more hole-shot or run with full ballast and a boat full of people, you may want to go down in pitch. On my SN, 1" in pitch equals approximately 400 RPMs.

    Based on the propellers you asked about in your post, the 1235 looks like the wakeboard prop. What is your W-O-T with the current prop?

    JQ

    Comment

    • nautiques4life
      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
      • Jan 2009
      • 696

      • SoCal

      • 2012 SANTE 230 Previous: 2005 SANTE 210 1997 OG Air Nautique

      #3
      Good info thank you Jonny, hopefully I'll make it out this weekend and be able to give you a better idea on my RPMs

      Comment

      Working...
      X