why is it that an old '82 Ski Nautique with a carburated 351 pulls so much harder and has a higher top speed than the newer '96 Sport Nautique with the GT-40 EFI motor rated at 310hp? My 96 Sport tops out at around 38mph, has a 4 blade prop - and it doesnt pull near as hard as my parents' 82 SN, which also has a 4 blade prop. I wouldn't think that the different weights of the boats would be too far off to make that big of a difference, but I could be wrong. Anyone know what's up? :?: :???:
X
-
Less surface area on the old boats, less drag. Still to slow for the 96 though. What's the RPM at 38MPH? The RPM on the 96 at WOT will help us figure out the problem.
Comment
-
-
Are you running side by side and comparing? Could the speedometer be off in one of them? As far as pull....I would guess it's the prop. I know that the new prop in my 99 Sport made a big difference in the pull.88 Ski Nautique
99 Sport Nautique
Currently - 07 Nautique 216 Team
Comment
-
-
1,000 Post Club Member
- Apr 2005
- 1407
- Discovery Bay, CA
- 2001 Super Air Nautique (Current) 1998 Ski Nautique (former) 1982 Ski Nautique (Current)
350 lbs. difference in those boats, which is significant. However, you should still get at least 43 and probably 45 from that sport. As said, prop or tune up are likely issues. BKH2001 Super Air
Comment
-
The number of baldes the prop has doesn't matter, the pitch does. I would bet that the older boats prop is 1/2 inch bigger in diameter and 2" pitch less. The 96 is probably running a 12.5 X 15.5 and the 82 is probably running a 13X13 Check it out Good LuckNautiqueless in San Diego
Comment
-
-
the prop on the sport is a 13 x 16. Also- there is a distinct gas smell from under the teak platform when it idles.
the '82 has a 13 x 13 prop and the dang thing will almost pull your arms off. I think it might just be a freak.1996 Sport Nautique w/ EFI GT-40
Comment
-
Comment