Ronix Timebomb or Hyperlite Murray?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thejean
    Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
    • Aug 2017
    • 364

    • Calgary, AB


    Ronix Timebomb or Hyperlite Murray?

    Gonna get a new wakeboard this winter. I’m a beginner but progressing quick so want an intermediate to advanced board. The Timebomb looks awesome but so does the Murray. Want soft and forgiving landings. Thoughts?
  • NautiqueJeff
    A d m i n i s t r a t o r
    • Mar 2002
    • 16467
    • Lake Norman

    • Mooresville, NC

    • 2025 SAN G23 PNE 1998 Ski Nautique 1985 Sea Nautique 1980 Twin-Engine Fish Nautique

    #2
    Love the Murray boards. I have ridden those since the beginning.
    I own and operate Silver Cove Marine, which is an inboard boat restoration, service, and sales facility located in Mooresville, North Carolina. We specializes in Nautiques and Correct Crafts, and also provide general service for Nautiques fifteen years old and older.

    If we can be of service to you, please contact us anytime!




    Current Boats —> 2025 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2001 Ski Nautique -- 2000 Nautique Super Sport PYTHON -- 2000 Nautique Super Sport -- 1999 Ski Nautique PYTHON-- 1985 Sea Nautique 2700 (Twin-Engine, 1 of 13) -- 1981 Fish Nautique (Twin-Engine, 1 of 4) -- 1980 Fish Nautique (Twin-Engine, 1 of 4)
    Former Boats —> 2024 Super Air Nautique G23 PARAGON -- 2023 Super Air Nautique G23 --
    2022 Super Air Nautique G23 PARAGON -- 2021 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2021 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2020 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2019 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2018 Super Air Nautique G23-- 2018 SAN 210 TE -- 2017 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2016 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2015 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2014 Super Air Nautique G23 -- 2014 Super Air Nautique 230 Team Edition2013 Super Air Nautique G232012 Super Air Nautique 210 Team Edition2011 Super Air Nautique 210 Team Edition2010 Super Air Nautique 210 Team Edition2008 Super Air Nautique 230 Team Edition2007 Air Nautique 236 Team Edition -- 2007 Air Nautique SV-211 -- 2005 SV-211 -- 2003 Super Air Nautique 210 Team Edition -- 2003 Air Nautique 226 -- 2003 Sport Nautique 216 -- 2003 Ski Nautique 196 -- 2003 Ski Nautique 196-- 2002 Ski Nautique-- 2001 Sport Nautique -- 2001 Ski Nautique -- 2000 Sport Nautique --1999 Ski Nautique Open Bow -- 1999 Air Tique 176 -- 1998 Ski Nautique -- 1998 Ski Nautique -- 1998 Ski Nautique -- 1997 Ski Nautique -- 1997 Ski Nautique -- 1996 Ski Nautique Open Bow -- 1994 Ski Nautique -- 1993 Barefoot Nautique -- 1983 Fish Nautique (TWIN ENGINE, 1 of 4) -- 1981 Fish Nautique (SINGLE ENGINE)

    Need something for your boat? Please check out our site sponsors! Not only do they offer the best products available, they also support this site.
    Silver Cove Marine - NautiqueParts.com - Phoenix Trailers - SkiSafe - PCM Marine Engines - C&S Marine - OJ Propellers

    Comment

    • thejean
      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
      • Aug 2017
      • 364

      • Calgary, AB


      #3
      Originally posted by NautiqueJeff View Post
      Love the Murray boards. I have ridden those since the beginning.
      Thanks Jeff! So what specifically do you like about the Murray? And have you ridden any of the Timebomb series ever?

      Comment

      • shag
        1,000 Post Club Member
        • Jul 2003
        • 2217

        • Florida


        #4
        Anyone know the difference between the time bomb and the timebomb ATR? I think it is just construction..

        Comment

        • thejean
          Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
          • Aug 2017
          • 364

          • Calgary, AB


          #5
          Originally posted by shag View Post
          Anyone know the difference between the time bomb and the timebomb ATR? I think it is just construction..
          Yes I believe so. The ATR is a tad bit heavier and a bit more rugged is my understanding. But it also doesn’t pop quite as much as the Timebomb apparently either.

          Comment

          • Kmayotte
            Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
            • Apr 2010
            • 819

            • Lake Winnipesaukee, NH

            • 2016 G23, 1999 SN Python Past: 2004 SANTE, 1993 SN

            #6
            I've ridden both. I ride a 2018 Murray. My daily riding partner rides a Time Bomb and I've given it a go a few times.

            The Murray is more predictable and lands softer.
            The Time Bomb has a smaller sweet spot but when you connect it it's more booty and lively than the Murray. I had trouble getting it to connect on the lip every-time. Just a more advanced board.

            For your skill level I would go with the Murray hands down.

            The ATR is the lower level Time Bomb material (still a very nice board). The higher level one has a carbon stringer I believe. My buddy broke that model pretty quickly actually (bought it thinking it was stronger). He's riding the lower level now.

            I would say both Ronix constructions are nicer than the Murray construction just by an eye test but my Murray has held up to all the abuse so far.

            Comment

            • thejean
              Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
              • Aug 2017
              • 364

              • Calgary, AB


              #7
              Originally posted by Kmayotte View Post
              I've ridden both. I ride a 2018 Murray. My daily riding partner rides a Time Bomb and I've given it a go a few times.

              The Murray is more predictable and lands softer.
              The Time Bomb has a smaller sweet spot but when you connect it it's more booty and lively than the Murray. I had trouble getting it to connect on the lip every-time. Just a more advanced board.

              For your skill level I would go with the Murray hands down.

              The ATR is the lower level Time Bomb material (still a very nice board). The higher level one has a carbon stringer I believe. My buddy broke that model pretty quickly actually (bought it thinking it was stronger). He's riding the lower level now.

              I would say both Ronix constructions are nicer than the Murray construction just by an eye test but my Murray has held up to all the abuse so far.
              Ok that’s really great info! Thanks so much. You’re one of the few that have ridden both and provided a great explanation of the the differences. I was originally leaning towards the Murray but of course one always thinks they can handle the more advanced equipment when in fact that’s not always the case. Just like running my G23 at full ballast and 25 mph - sure my boat can do it but I would die trying it! Lol

              Comment

              • Kmayotte
                Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                • Apr 2010
                • 819

                • Lake Winnipesaukee, NH

                • 2016 G23, 1999 SN Python Past: 2004 SANTE, 1993 SN

                #8
                Originally posted by thejean View Post

                Ok that’s really great info! Thanks so much. You’re one of the few that have ridden both and provided a great explanation of the the differences. I was originally leaning towards the Murray but of course one always thinks they can handle the more advanced equipment when in fact that’s not always the case. Just like running my G23 at full ballast and 25 mph - sure my boat can do it but I would die trying it! Lol
                No worries. I changed my G setup this year from 70' @ 23.5 mph to 65' @ 22mph (full ballast). I consider myself an advanced but not expert rider (several invert variations heelside & toeside). The slowing down of the boat made the impacts much softer and my riding improved. I like the wake shape better too. My buddy rides at 70% ballast as he tends to power through the wake and ride very aggressively whereas I have more finesse for pop and like the extra meatiness of the wake.

                Comment

                • thejean
                  Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                  • Aug 2017
                  • 364

                  • Calgary, AB


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Kmayotte View Post

                  No worries. I changed my G setup this year from 70' @ 23.5 mph to 65' @ 22mph (full ballast). I consider myself an advanced but not expert rider (several invert variations heelside & toeside). The slowing down of the boat made the impacts much softer and my riding improved. I like the wake shape better too. My buddy rides at 70% ballast as he tends to power through the wake and ride very aggressively whereas I have more finesse for pop and like the extra meatiness of the wake.
                  Do you find a significant variation in firmness of the water at say 21 mph to 22 or 23 mph? I currently run no ballast, 55’ and 21 mph. Was thinking about speeding up and lengthening the rope. Or going more ballast. Not sure... but I’m 43 year old and these old bones can’t handle too many big crashes! I only just started going W2W but have only wakeboarded a few times as well. Also I’m currently on a 2010 Ronix One 138 (180 lbs) and it’s a tough board to get the hang of (somewhat advanced from what I understand) so that may be holding me back also. If I go Murray 145 everything just seems like it will be better and I might not need to go faster or add ballast right away. Thoughts?

                  Comment

                  • Kmayotte
                    Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 819

                    • Lake Winnipesaukee, NH

                    • 2016 G23, 1999 SN Python Past: 2004 SANTE, 1993 SN

                    #10
                    I think you'll see a world of difference once you go from the Ronix One to the Murray especially if you upsize to the 145. I guarantee pop will be more consistent and landings will be softer. Shawn Murray is 42, age is just a number!!

                    If you're solid wake-to-wake you can start lengthening the line. With more line comes a better wake shape/lip and more speed comes a firmer wake. 22-23 mph is the money spot of firm wake without having the impacts of fall be too intense. The G wake without ballast is still bigger than a lot of wakes on top of the line slammed wakeboats from the 2000's so there's plenty there to learn on without adding ballast.

                    Don't forget about learning toe-side. No heelside hero's haha!

                    Comment

                    • thejean
                      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                      • Aug 2017
                      • 364

                      • Calgary, AB


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Kmayotte View Post
                      I think you'll see a world of difference once you go from the Ronix One to the Murray especially if you upsize to the 145. I guarantee pop will be more consistent and landings will be softer. Shawn Murray is 42, age is just a number!!

                      If you're solid wake-to-wake you can start lengthening the line. With more line comes a better wake shape/lip and more speed comes a firmer wake. 22-23 mph is the money spot of firm wake without having the impacts of fall be too intense. The G wake without ballast is still bigger than a lot of wakes on top of the line slammed wakeboats from the 2000's so there's plenty there to learn on without adding ballast.

                      Don't forget about learning toe-side. No heelside hero's haha!
                      Once again, awesome info and greatly appreciated you taking the time to post it.

                      Been watching lots of toe side instructional videos not to mention a host of others. I can do them all with my eyes closed but now I need to do them on the water with my eyes open (instead of in my dreams while sleeping)! But I still have all winter to dream before I put this learning and new board to the test. lol

                      Comment

                      • mtt201819
                        • Sep 2018
                        • 56

                        • CALIFORNIA


                        #12
                        thejean if you're 180 lbs, a 138 is too small. You want the 145 Murray (maybe even the 150) or the 146 One board. Here are the break downs of the boards

                        Ronix One:
                        Aggressive 3 stage rocker = instant vertical pop, large flat spot
                        Speedwalls = ABS sidewall gives the board more glidespeed, make it easier to gain and keep speed. That means less drag on your body
                        Fuse Stringers = Carbon rods that run tip to tail. These rods bend when you cut into the wake, and snap back into place when you leave the wake. They help boot you!
                        Timebomb VS. ATR = Both boards are the exact same shape and both use fuse stringers. ATR is a PU Foam core. Timebomb is a PVC core. Again, the board bends when you cut into the wake and snaps back to original shape when you leave the wake. PVC core snaps back quicker (and is lighter material) to boot you more. ATR is more durable than Timebomb

                        Hyperlite Murray
                        Subtle 3 stage rocker = Easier for everyone to ride (as it usual for Murray boards). Still vertical kick, but not as gnarly as the One board
                        Variable edges = Edges between the boots pushes water under board. So if you like to butterslide, this board tries hard to not catch an edge
                        Built like a spoon = Murray himself explained this. The center of the board is the high spot of the board. Think of a spoon you push bottom first into the water. It disperses the water. His board does the same. This means soft landings! That combined with the dual fins means the board actually centers you if you get a little off while landing.
                        Biolite core = Hyperlite's gold standard PU foam. Actually pretty durable design.

                        Comment

                        • thejean
                          Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                          • Aug 2017
                          • 364

                          • Calgary, AB


                          #13
                          Originally posted by mtt201819 View Post
                          thejean if you're 180 lbs, a 138 is too small. You want the 145 Murray (maybe even the 150) or the 146 One board. Here are the break downs of the boards

                          Ronix One:
                          Aggressive 3 stage rocker = instant vertical pop, large flat spot
                          Speedwalls = ABS sidewall gives the board more glidespeed, make it easier to gain and keep speed. That means less drag on your body
                          Fuse Stringers = Carbon rods that run tip to tail. These rods bend when you cut into the wake, and snap back into place when you leave the wake. They help boot you!
                          Timebomb VS. ATR = Both boards are the exact same shape and both use fuse stringers. ATR is a PU Foam core. Timebomb is a PVC core. Again, the board bends when you cut into the wake and snaps back to original shape when you leave the wake. PVC core snaps back quicker (and is lighter material) to boot you more. ATR is more durable than Timebomb

                          Hyperlite Murray
                          Subtle 3 stage rocker = Easier for everyone to ride (as it usual for Murray boards). Still vertical kick, but not as gnarly as the One board
                          Variable edges = Edges between the boots pushes water under board. So if you like to butterslide, this board tries hard to not catch an edge
                          Built like a spoon = Murray himself explained this. The center of the board is the high spot of the board. Think of a spoon you push bottom first into the water. It disperses the water. His board does the same. This means soft landings! That combined with the dual fins means the board actually centers you if you get a little off while landing.
                          Biolite core = Hyperlite's gold standard PU foam. Actually pretty durable design.
                          Thanks for this info and the explanations to go with the marketing / technical jargon. I think I’ve decided to go with the 145 Murray. I’m not good enough yet to make use of a TB. And my knees need soft landings and my skill level demands consistency.

                          Comment

                          • thejean
                            Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                            • Aug 2017
                            • 364

                            • Calgary, AB


                            #14
                            Board and boots ordered!!!

                            Comment

                            • srock
                              1,000 Post Club Member
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 1065

                              • Florida

                              • 2009 Super Air 230 2005 Whaler Dauntless

                              #15
                              Once you get comfortable the impact on your body will lesson as you develop some style. You may not push as hard as someone younger but you will get better each time out. For me at 54 years old the key is to keep riding and I could jump wake to wake all day long just as easy as walking down the street. Also, the Murray is a great choice. You may also consider getting another board that rides completely opposite to mix up the fun. I switch between the Murray and a Slingshot and they are totally different rides...it's fun.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X