i'm in the process of trying to figure out the best ski to buy for my father and i to share.let me first start by saying my dads a **** of a skier, one of those die hard,old school run watcha brung kinda a guy.he could make saloming on a 2x4 look easy.he's been skiing for almost 40 yrs and has always used what ever was laying around,and skiing behind what ever POS boats been around.so needless to say he loves the nautique and i'm anxious to see what he could really do with a real slalom.he's 5'9 165 lbs.i'm 5'11 and about 185,depending on the time of the year!we will never be skiing a course and he's small enough that he rarely wants to pulled above 32-34 or so.i'm not near the skier he is,but am not that far off..or atleast thats what i tell myself.i've been looking and looking and am clueless.there's i nice obrien mapp. 68 on ccfn i think i could get for a reasonable price, but was planning on buying new.let me also state that i'd prefer a rear toe strap,not a binding. what about the obrien big daddy,its looks like fun.also any rope lengths and spds. combos would be great too.-cody
X
-
Take a look at a 67" CDX. Might be a tad short for you and slightly less long for him. The mapple tends to hunt a bit and can be a little sensitive to fin settings. Throw a wiley boot with a toe plate on it and you'll be in business. I was on a mapple for a while, then switched to the CDX for several years before going with the monza. All were great skis, but were very different.1998 Ski Nautique (Red/Silver Cloud), GT-40, Perfect Pass Stargazer 8.0z (Zbox), Acme #422, Tunable Rudder.
-
-
thanks east tx skier
not to sound stupid....but who makes the 67 cdx.i've been looking at ho,conn.,and obrien.i've always been kinda partial to obrien,always had good luck out of there products.98 sport gt-40
buying stuff i don\'t need to impress people i don\'t know with money i don\'t have
Comment
-
-
RE: thanks east tx skier
If you like Obrien then consider a 66" syncro, or a Connely F1x in a 67. Both are nice skis and will serve you well on the open water, or in the slalom course. I'm a not a fan of the cdx, unless you really favor a tail riding ski.2005 Ski Nautique 206 SE, Acme 422, PP SG 8.0, ND Tower
2011 strada with strada bindings
Prior Boats:
1986 Sunbird skier with 150 Evinrude VRO
1992 Mastercraft prostar 190, with Powerslot
1999 Ski Nautique GT-40
1999 Sport Nautique, GT-40 FCT,
www.skiersofknoxville.org
Comment
-
-
RE: thanks east tx skier
I like the HO Triumph skis. I have a 69 myself. I'm a mediocre skier, and my neighbor is an ex course junky. We both like the ski a lot. This time of the year some good closeout deals are to be found.
I bought mine for less than 1/2 of retail at this place: http://www.adrenalinewatersports.com...ID=68&pg=12001 Ski Nautique / 2007 SV211 TE (gone but not forgotten)
Comment
-
-
RE: thanks east tx skier
Connelly F1X gets my vote for an outstanding intermediate/advanced slalom ski. I put it up against the Triumph and the Synchro on my website and the F1X was heads above the others for my style of skiing.
Comment
-
-
Re: thanks east tx skier
Originally posted by cmdnot to sound stupid....but who makes the 67 cdx.i've been looking at ho,conn.,and obrien.i've always been kinda partial to obrien,always had good luck out of there products.
www.wileyski.com
Again, check out the Wiley bindings as well. They're great!1998 Ski Nautique (Red/Silver Cloud), GT-40, Perfect Pass Stargazer 8.0z (Zbox), Acme #422, Tunable Rudder.
Comment
-
-
The HO Nitro (FKA Vengance) is also a very nice ski, it is relatively easy to get up on and holds an edge on rough water. Have also skied the F1X which is very comparable to the Nitro. The Mapple you mentioned is a pretty advanced ski and unless you are skiing in a course it would probably be more than you need. Another user friendly ski which is not overly advanced is the Kidder KD7000.
Check out www.ski-it-again.com and www.skifly.com for used gear.
Comment
-
-
You may want to check out the ski reviews at
http://www.waterskitests.com/2007/RecTest/Intro.htm
I bought the Triumph and it was love at first ride.
Comment
-
-
The O'brien Mapple/Sixam is a great ski, and very easy to ride for all abilities. I think a 67 would suit you better though. I have a Sixam-1 that is phenominal. My brother in-law has a CDX-1 and is not a course skier, and he likes my ski better and his ability seems equivalent to yours. As far as the rear toe plate goes, I will say that once you get used to a rear high wrap, you will wonder how you ever skied with out it.
Comment
-
-
1,000 Post Club Member
- Apr 2005
- 1407
- Discovery Bay, CA
- 2001 Super Air Nautique (Current) 1998 Ski Nautique (former) 1982 Ski Nautique (Current)
Originally posted by brodieAs far as the rear toe plate goes, I will say that once you get used to a rear high wrap, you will wonder how you ever skied with out it.
BKH2001 Super Air
Comment
-
Originally posted by bkhallpassOriginally posted by brodieAs far as the rear toe plate goes, I will say that once you get used to a rear high wrap, you will wonder how you ever skied with out it.
BKH
Comment
-
-
I am going to agree 100% with BKH on the Boot vs. Toe plate. I learned open toe then went to double boot, skied 2 boots for 15+ yrs, 2 yrs ago went back to open toe and never looked back. Made no difference nor had any effect on my performance and I like the option of starting 1 or 2 feet in.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bkhallpassOriginally posted by brodieAs far as the rear toe plate goes, I will say that once you get used to a rear high wrap, you will wonder how you ever skied with out it.
BKH
Comment
-
Comment