JL M600/6 vs. Wetsounds HTX6

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Evening Shade
    1,000 Post Club Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 1295

    • Martinez, GA/Lake Greenwood, SC

    • 2017 GS20 Previous: 2011 SAN 210, 2007 Malibu Wakesetter 23LSV, 1995 Cobalt 200

    JL M600/6 vs. Wetsounds HTX6

    I'm planning to upgrade the amps in my boat to 2 Wetsounds HTX6s, but then I saw that JL M600/6 amps are the same price so now I'm not sure which amp I should go with.

    Thoughts?
    2007 Malibu Wakesetter 23 LSV, 1995 Cobalt 200
  • core-rider
    1,000 Post Club Member
    • Feb 2004
    • 1345

    • Huntsville, AL

    • 2003 Black SANTE

    #2
    Personally I'd go with the WS amps since cost is the same between the two and WS offers a bit more power than that JL amp. If you were comparing their HD line of amps I'd sway towards JL though.
    Jason
    All black 2003 SANTE
    -- Southern Fried --

    Comment

    • MLA
      1,000 Post Club Member
      • Dec 2009
      • 1312

      • Lake Wylie NC Area


      #3
      Neither is a bad choice. ive been running an HTX-6 since their release and have been real happy with it. The little bit of wattage difference may not translate into an audible difference in volume, but its always nice to have a little extra headroom.

      Comment

      • David Analog
        • Sep 2013
        • 263

        • Dallas


        #4
        To determine a real value comparison, you have to look at the entire package and whether the rather minor differences will impact you and your specific application.
        Power difference? The JL Audio power is rated @ a 20 to 20 kHz bandwidth versus @ 1 kHz. And JL Audio gives you a maximum output voltage to set, which JL can still deliver with a lower 12.6 volt supply, evidence of their conservative power ratings. However, I suspect the Wetsounds still has an edge in power, although perhaps not enough of a difference to be substantially impactful from an audible standpoint.
        Other considerations are the JL Audio ultra high switching speed of their Class D amplifiers, cast heat sinks versus extruded, detented crossover settings for frequency accuracy, and a flexible input section with a remote level control port.
        I would own either if my application favored one over the other.

        Comment

        • pSchwade
          • May 2012
          • 127

          • Reno

          • 07' 220 SANTE

          #5
          you would get an extra 100w if you run bridged with 2 speakers in series (so an extra 50w per speaker), not sure if the power will be as clean as the JL, but thats not an insignificant amount of power difference.

          Comment

          • MLA
            1,000 Post Club Member
            • Dec 2009
            • 1312

            • Lake Wylie NC Area


            #6
            Originally posted by pSchwade View Post
            you would get an extra 100w if you run bridged with 2 speakers in series (so an extra 50w per speaker).
            It would be the same wattage to each speaker, as if each speaker was wired to its own chnl, so no advantage power wise.

            Comment

            • pSchwade
              • May 2012
              • 127

              • Reno

              • 07' 220 SANTE

              #7
              yea, you're right - for some reason I was thinking that the bridged power values were at 8ohms, not 4.

              Comment

              • Neverenough
                Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                • Sep 2012
                • 907

                • Ft. Worth Texas

                • G

                #8
                Never had any WS stuff but I just did JLs in our boat. HD and a M series. I couldn't be happier with the power and how clean they are. I'm no expert but I'm super stoked about them.

                Had WS speakers and 420 but not amps
                Last edited by Neverenough; 05-18-2016, 09:06 PM.

                Comment

                • Evening Shade
                  1,000 Post Club Member
                  • Apr 2015
                  • 1295

                  • Martinez, GA/Lake Greenwood, SC

                  • 2017 GS20 Previous: 2011 SAN 210, 2007 Malibu Wakesetter 23LSV, 1995 Cobalt 200

                  #9
                  I think I'm gonna go with the WS amps. I have a friend that can get me pretty good deal on WS. Thanks for everyone's input.
                  2007 Malibu Wakesetter 23 LSV, 1995 Cobalt 200

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X