Subwoofer for 210

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David Analog
    • Sep 2013
    • 263

    • Dallas


    #31
    Can't say. Even backing up to a compound angle, it looks possible with a creative build.
    What worries me most is that I have seen way too many examples of when the sub box and bass-reflex port is modified in order to fit the boat and without the technician having a clue as to what consequences those changes make. Once a sub box is tucked inside the helm cavity, as a consumer, you never get to see what was done to make it fit. Smaller box? Shorter/smaller port? Less material thickness? So the correct way to proceed is once the boat is partially disassembled you assess what you have and make the best resulting selection at that time and not until that time. You know that a 12" bass-reflex is not an option. You know that a 10" bass-reflex will be a larger enclosure than a sealed 12" or two sealed 10". Stubbornly forcing one scheme into an application is not the way to go. I know I trust Joe with Earmark Marine to be conscientious, always do the right thing, and have the technical aptitude to make the right selection to match the application.

    Comment

    • cedarcreek216
      1,000 Post Club Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 1009

      • Dallas, TX

      • 2018 210 2013 210 2009 216V

      #32
      I decided to go a completely different route. Like David expected, there was not enough room to get a proper enclosure in the void under the steering wheel. I still did not want to give up much storage so we went with a 8" Treo sub with a 1000 watt Treo amp in a ported enclosure tucked in the very front of the storage under the passenger seat. It sounds incredible, particularly for an 8". The installer wanted to louvre the access door for more venting but knew I was not hot on that idea so did the vent right in front of the sub and port. I will end up adding more vent surface at some point as it is a little restricted with the current vent surface area.

      With all the restrictions I put in them, I could not be happier with the outcome.




      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • Guntersville230
        Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
        • Aug 2015
        • 419

        • Guntersville, AL

        • 2015 SAN 230

        #33
        Can u post a video? If u dont mind me asking what was cost just for equipment (sub, box, amp)?

        Sent from my SM-G935V using PLANETNAUTIQUE mobile app

        Comment

        • cedarcreek216
          1,000 Post Club Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 1009

          • Dallas, TX

          • 2018 210 2013 210 2009 216V

          #34
          Not sure a video will do a whole lot to indicate the low range sound other than just sound weird. The cost can of course vary depending on equipment. I think the equipment total with box was about $1500. I won't be around the boat until next weekend for a video. One thing I will do eventually, as mentioned above, is add more vent area.


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

          Comment

          • Guntersville230
            Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
            • Aug 2015
            • 419

            • Guntersville, AL

            • 2015 SAN 230

            #35
            True, I guess the main question would be is it SIGNIFICANTLY better than the stock sub?

            Sent from my SM-G935V using PLANETNAUTIQUE mobile app

            Comment

            • cedarcreek216
              1,000 Post Club Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 1009

              • Dallas, TX

              • 2018 210 2013 210 2009 216V

              #36
              Yes, I have zero regrets having spent the money. Will be even better if/when I add more vent area.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

              Comment

              • markj
                1,000 Post Club Member
                • Apr 2005
                • 1194

                • NorCal

                • Current: 2015 230 Sold: 2005 SAN 210 1991 Barefoot

                #37
                Have you tried opening that huge access door in the walk through to see the effects of that?

                Comment

                • David Analog
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 263

                  • Dallas


                  #38
                  Yes, you can add more vent surface area, and that's a good thing to do, however, you cannot beat of the location of the first, best, and existing vent location. It's low against the sole and focused directly into the cockpit listening area. I think it could be expanded a bit, be a bit more open and acoustically transparent, but I like the location. Just around the corner, facing starboard, and aft of the pass-thru would be my choice for a second vent. Small, but still low and within the context of the cockpit area.

                  Comment

                  • cedarcreek216
                    1,000 Post Club Member
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 1009

                    • Dallas, TX

                    • 2018 210 2013 210 2009 216V

                    #39
                    The original vent location was the access panel in the walk through, but he knew I was not excited about the integrity of the hatch door once chopped up and as David mentioned, we all though the chosen location was best for performance. If I add more, it will be in the same location but just around the bend.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • Guntersville230
                      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                      • Aug 2015
                      • 419

                      • Guntersville, AL

                      • 2015 SAN 230

                      #40
                      Honestly, not only for stereo purposes but also for airflow and ventilation, nautique should vent under the seats like this under all the cockpit storage areas in my opinion.....seem like it would help when things need to dry out?!

                      Sent from my SM-G935V using PLANETNAUTIQUE mobile app

                      Comment

                      • scarbs
                        Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 450

                        • Arizona

                        • 2017 G23

                        #41
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpeg
Views:	246
Size:	54.1 KB
ID:	499542 Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpeg
Views:	177
Size:	47.5 KB
ID:	499543
                        Originally posted by cedarcreek216 View Post
                        I decided to go a completely different route. Like David expected, there was not enough room to get a proper enclosure in the void under the steering wheel. I still did not want to give up much storage so we went with a 8" Treo sub with a 1000 watt Treo amp in a ported enclosure tucked in the very front of the storage under the passenger seat. It sounds incredible, particularly for an 8". The installer wanted to louvre the access door for more venting but knew I was not hot on that idea so did the vent right in front of the sub and port. I will end up adding more vent surface at some point as it is a little restricted with the current vent surface area.

                        With all the restrictions I put in them, I could not be happier with the outcome.




                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                        This looks like an awesome solution. I did something similar, but with a JL Audio 13tw5. But I have been curious about how the 8" subs would do in there ever since my son put an 8" JL ported sub in his truck that is incredible.

                        2017 G23
                        2012 210 TE
                        1999 SAN
                        1995 Sport
                        1991 Sport

                        Comment

                        • David Analog
                          • Sep 2013
                          • 263

                          • Dallas


                          #42
                          scarbs,
                          I have also done a down-firing slim-line 13.5" sub under those same conditions. It was very good but not outstanding considering the size of the sub. A slim-line sub is inherently a little less sensitive with a little less excursion. Down-firing also reduces the radiating surface area which is costly to bass energy. All issues that would never be exposed in an enclosed vehicle cabin.

                          In that same space, using the JL Audio 8W3 in a side-firing bass-reflex enclosure would be impressive, and surprising for an 8". Using two 8W3s would be even better. Standard deep architecture sub drivers are preferred in open air use.

                          Comment

                          • cedarcreek216
                            1,000 Post Club Member
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 1009

                            • Dallas, TX

                            • 2018 210 2013 210 2009 216V

                            #43
                            I agree with David, as the speaker continues to get broken in, I am more impressed with not only the volume of the sub but more so the range of the 8". I will add more vent area this winter as there is a significant difference when I either pop the seat up or open the access door in the walkway. Could not be happier with the solution and most of all the lack of space I had to give up.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X