Can't say. Even backing up to a compound angle, it looks possible with a creative build.
What worries me most is that I have seen way too many examples of when the sub box and bass-reflex port is modified in order to fit the boat and without the technician having a clue as to what consequences those changes make. Once a sub box is tucked inside the helm cavity, as a consumer, you never get to see what was done to make it fit. Smaller box? Shorter/smaller port? Less material thickness? So the correct way to proceed is once the boat is partially disassembled you assess what you have and make the best resulting selection at that time and not until that time. You know that a 12" bass-reflex is not an option. You know that a 10" bass-reflex will be a larger enclosure than a sealed 12" or two sealed 10". Stubbornly forcing one scheme into an application is not the way to go. I know I trust Joe with Earmark Marine to be conscientious, always do the right thing, and have the technical aptitude to make the right selection to match the application.
What worries me most is that I have seen way too many examples of when the sub box and bass-reflex port is modified in order to fit the boat and without the technician having a clue as to what consequences those changes make. Once a sub box is tucked inside the helm cavity, as a consumer, you never get to see what was done to make it fit. Smaller box? Shorter/smaller port? Less material thickness? So the correct way to proceed is once the boat is partially disassembled you assess what you have and make the best resulting selection at that time and not until that time. You know that a 12" bass-reflex is not an option. You know that a 10" bass-reflex will be a larger enclosure than a sealed 12" or two sealed 10". Stubbornly forcing one scheme into an application is not the way to go. I know I trust Joe with Earmark Marine to be conscientious, always do the right thing, and have the technical aptitude to make the right selection to match the application.
Comment